Posted on 01/16/2011 11:31:27 AM PST by Kaslin
Why is Paris known as the City of Lights ? Is it because the U.S. Congress banned Thomas Edison’s incandescent light bulbs, so he had to take his invention offshore?
Well, not actually. Thomas Edison was an honoree at the 1889 Paris Universal Exposition and he did go up in the Eiffel Tower . The Italian government conferred a knighthood at that event on the man who gave the world a brighter idea.
No, Congress in the 1880s would not have been so foolish as to extinguish Edison ’s light bulb. But the liberal Congress in 2007 was so foolish. They passed (and, regrettably, President George W. Bush signed) the BULB Act. That cutesy acronym stood for the Better Use of Light Bulbs Act. By that act, incandescent light bulbs were to have been phased out by 2014.
The BULB Act was co-sponsored by Calif. Rep. Jane Harmon (D) and Michigan Rep. Fred Upton (R). Back in those halcyon days of green legislation, of cost-free environmentalism, few people noticed that one of America ’s greatest inventions was about to be banned by act of Congress.
Liberals were, quite literally, turning lights out on America --at least the incandescent kind. Edison ’s invention was being treated like asbestos and lead paint. But once consumers got wind of the coming ban, they began hoarding “real” light bulbs.
Soon, documented stories began circulating highlighting negative aspects of the new, eco-friendly compact fluorescent light (CFL) light bulbs. It was as if the Congress had tried to insert a CFL—Canadian Football League—championship game in place of the Super Bowl.
Heritage Foundation researchers Kelsey Huber and Nicholas D. Loris alerted readers of Human Events that CFLs use high levels of mercury. They may last longer than real bulbs, but watch out if you break one or discard it. CFLs, Huber and Loris noted, can also cause migraines and aggravate epilepsy! What does this say about forcing them on health care providers?
Even the New York Times conceded that government nannying had failed to persuade consumers to shift from incandescents. The reason: they are cheap.
Many voters last fall were incandescent in their outrage of Congress’ meddling with the economy, with people’s way of life—and livelihoods. U.S. factories that make incandescent bulbs were shutting down, laying off American workers, only to have China pick up the slack.
Rush Limbaugh took up the conservative cudgels. When Michigan Congressman Upton rode back into office on the Republican tide last fall, Rush pointed to the BULB Act as Exhibit A in the case against Upton’s becoming chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
“This would be a tone-deaf disaster if the Republican leadership lets Fred Upton ascend to the chairmanship of the House energy committee,” Rush told his millions of listeners.
“This is exactly the kind of nannysim, statism…that was voted against and defeated [in the Midterm elections.]”
Three House Republicans—Joel Barton ( Texas ), Marsha Blackburn ( Tenn. ), and Michael Burgess (Texas) went so far as to introduce legislation to repeal the BULB Act. Fred Upton not only co-sponsored the BULB Act, but he amassed a record of liberalism on social and economic issues. He even messed with Daylight Saving Time! Now, that’s really liberal.
Mr. Upton managed to slip into the chairman’s seat in the run-up to the 112th Congress, but only by signaling a new openness to changing the BULB Act. “We have heard from the grassroots loud and clear, and will have a hearing early next Congress,” Upton said. “The last thing we wanted to do was infringe upon personal liberties—and this has been a good lesson that Congress does not always know best…” Well, if Mr. Upton didn’t see the light, he surely felt the heat.
In banning the incandescent light bulb, Congress substituted its own judgment for the wishes of the American people. They specifically backhanded the American consumer.
They did something else, and this is perhaps the worst thing they did: They spurned the achievement of one of America ’s greatest geniuses. In 1914, when “the lights went out all over Europe ,” the U.S. Patent Office announced that Thomas Alva Edison had patented a new idea at the rate of one every two weeks for nearly 40 years! No wonder the home-schooled Edison was called “the wizard of Menlo Park .”
Edison left a brilliant legacy—patenting not only the incandescent light bulb, the phonograph, and the motion picture machine—but also giving Americans a confidence in their own native inventiveness. The world paid Edison an homage it will never pay to Nancy Pelosi.
Edison left some wise words for America , too. They can inspire us to climb out of the hole that many in government are digging for us:
"Be courageous! Whatever setbacks America has encountered, it has always emerged as a stronger and more prosperous nation....Be brave as your fathers before you. Have faith and go forward"
The danger from CFL’s overrated. Incandescents suck because they burn out frequently. With more expensive CFLs, you come out ahead on energy costs and and not having to change them on a frequent basis.
Halogens are good alternatives.
I'd instruct my lawyer to file a concurrent lawsuit against the Government and the manufacturers while also pleading extenuating, involuntary medical circumstances caused by MERCURY BULBS! [And, the weasel lawyer would be happy to do it]
I don't need the government telling me what lightbulbs I can and cannot use, I'll take incandescents any day of the week, I have no need to call the hazmat people if one should break, life is too short to be dealing with this nonsense, I think the government as more important things to consider.
Them little suckers put out lots of heat....gotta watch where you use them.
CFL have there merits but we just dont want to be forced to use them.
You can get incandescent light bulbs rated for 25,000 hours that are used by the hospitality industry. If you use them for an average of 7 hours a day they’ll burn out in just a little under 10 years and cost about a buck or less per bulb depending on how many you buy.
https://www.nathosp.com/product/25k19_c/standard_incandescent_light_bulbs
Once you stock up all you’ll have to do is watch out for the light bulb police who’ll be monitoring everyone who might be using those unauthorized, evil incandescents!
Agreed... if you watch where you put your fingers when you install the bulb, they’re a pretty good alternative to incandescents. They have a long life and they burn pretty bright.
their
I just noticed one of the 42W (150W equivalents) had burned out in my basement. It lasted a couple of years - like most of the incandescents I had down there before. Now, the dilemma, where/how to throw it away.....not a big question. It goes in the trash and to the land fill....I’m not going out of my way to accomodate the government. They can ride with the trashman to the dump if they want to. I didn’t ask for this.
That is true. Before; when I used Incandescent light bulbs, I had to replace them every 2 month
Vu1 Corporation is developing the ESL bulb (electron stimulated luminescence).
No toxic, vapor-form mercury like a CFL, the light spectrum of an incandescent, it’s dimmable, and lasts for about 10,000 hours.
http://www.vu1corporation.com/
Don’t halogens use a lot of power?
Throw em in the garbage... just watch out for the garbage police while you’re doing the dirty deed.
Except for the old carbon filament type bulbs; like this 109 year old light bulb.
I think I’ll just wrap them up in one of my grand daughter’s used poopy diapers......good luck to the inspector!...hahahhahaahhaahahahahaaaa
“I don’t need the government telling me what lightbulbs I can and cannot use”
Of course, that you would express such an ignorant opinion is proof positive that you need “experts” in Congress to help you sort through all those confusing choices and narrow them down to the one that will save mankind...
It’s surprising that members of Congress are not automatically conferred sainthood: they struggle night and day to make lives better for boobs who are too stupid to even appreciate what Congress is doing for them...
But fortunately, our Founders had the foresight to create a government “of the experts, by the experts and for the experts” etc., so congress-critters can plunge ahead knowing that Jefferson, Madison, Adams and Franklin etc. would admire their handiwork.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.