Posted on 02/05/2011 12:16:54 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Nate Silver, in his role as New York Times political poll analyst, has generated a graphical analysis of the various Republican contenders for the 2012 nomination. Clearly we’re still the better part of a year away from the primaries, but what else did you really have to do this weekend aside from arguing over election predictions? Let’s take a look at the graph and then spend a moment discussing how it was crafted.
We can skip over the relative merit of the chances assigned to each candidate (at least until the comments begin) since Nate took each person’s prospects for winning from their Intrade betting profile. Even the author doesn’t agree with all of them, but simply uses those values as a baseline. I’ll let Nate explain that part himself.
There are two more kinds of information embedded in the chart. First, the area of each candidate’s circle is proportional to their perceived likelihood of winning the nomination, according to the Intrade betting market. Mitt Romney’s circle is drawn many times the size of the one for the relatively obscure talk-radio host Herman Cain because Intrade rates Mr. Romney many times as likely to be nominated.
(I should note that there are several cases in which I am in considerable disagreement with the bettors at Intrade about the viability of each candidate. But using their figures as the basis for drawing the circles at least lends some objectivity to the assessment.)
If we ignore the size of the relative circles – which nobody is going to agree with anyway – the more interesting aspect of this chart is the placement. The further “north” a candidate falls, the more they are considered to be a Washington “insider.” A southerly position indicates a Beltway outsider. The further left they fall, the more “moderate” they are considered, (*cough* RINO) while a position more to the right indicates a perceived traditional conservative ideology.
Recent conventional wisdom would say that Washington insiders are distinctly out of favor, and traditional campaign strategy for the GOP tends to indicate that it’s better to be considered more conservative in the primary race. By that logic, placement in the upper left quadrant – where we find Giuliani, Huntsman and Pataki – would have the absolute worst chance. Landing in the lower right quadrant, as did Palin, Bachmann and Cain, would lend one the best chance.
If we then combine placement with the size of the bubble, indicating odds for victory, we find that Sarah Palin is clearly the next Republican presidential nominee and George Pataki should begin knitting sweaters for the residents of Hell if he plans on winning. But the alternate school of thought is that you need to be able to cast the broadest net for the most supporters, so getting closer to the center of each axis offers the best path to victory. By that rationale, Tim Pawlenty is clearly the next President of the United States and we may as well just skip the whole election.
So, have at it. Whose placement or relative odds is correct on this chart and which ones are totally outside of reality? Do any of the positioning choices surprise you?
Bogus positioning as Newty is more conservative than Palin.
The Huckster (being a JUANnabie) is not to the right of Mitt.
Backstabber Romney is to the LEFT of Sen. Kennedy.
Mitt Romney: "I'm not running as the Republican view or a continuation of Republican values.
That's not what brings me to the race.
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldn’t make any sense at all.""
-- President Ronald Reagan
Uh, the chart shows Newty as more conservative than Palin. I don't agree with it, though. He's lost a lot of conservative street cred, starting January 1995.
I also wouldn’t call “Huck Off” an outsider either. He’s as outside as Newt or Giuliani.
-- President Ronald Reagan
That's pretty vitriolic stuff there. Traitors? Battle? Didn't he realize some schizo could take that as encouragement to shoot a Congressman??
Palin plus anybody to the right of Romney...
Santorum? Thune?
I forgot my NOT.
That’ll do it to you sometimes. Somehow, I suspected there was a “not” missing...
I’ll vote for anyone in the lower right quadrant except Huckabee. I will not vote for libs (anyone left of the centerline) or insiders (any one above the center line.) Demint has only a tiny portion of his circle that is barely above the center line but even then he’s still way right of the line, so I’d have no problem voting for him.
Forget those other three quadrants. They are RINOs and elitists. I will not vote for any of them.
It should on the left, as an insider and deflated.
That’s my analysis, too. It’s interesting that all three of my favorites are in that box. :)
Seems like a pretty accurate chart, except that Huckabee and Gingrich are way too far right.
What do the colors mean?
My best guess is blue = Easterner, red = Southerner,
green = midwesterner, yellow = westerner.
Which Johnson is that moderate outsider? The newly elected Senator from Wisconsin? Thune should get yellow before he does.
Oh no, the figure has blue balls and uncivil crosshairs. Hide the children.
I won’t vote for Huckabee or Mitt. But mitt is a socialist. He is DADT abolishing, mandate, gay marriage and ENDA loving; gun grabbing; pro-abortion; father of Obamacare. He’s one of the biggest socialist RINOs in the republican party.
Like Mitt, Huckabee may be a soft on crime, big govt. loving, statist but unlike Mitt, he is not social lib.
RE: What do the colors mean?
You guess it right.
According to the original article linked above, the color of each circle reflects the region the candidate is from:
blue for the Northeast,
red for the South,
green for the Midwest,
and yellow for the West.
Right.
Which Johnson is that moderate outsider
Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.