Posted on 03/09/2011 10:49:47 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Dangerous, obstructive, and don’t you forget it.
We don’t want to have to come back again, angry.
Works for me... ;^)
Hope things are going good for you Tet68.
Tea Party: CFR Dangerous, Obstructive
Don’t you just love how an amorphous power such as the TP continues to baffle the BS’ers in all sectors of the political spectrum? This new TP political ‘paradigm’ appears to be threatening to all the Utopian dreams of the statist elite and their fear is evident @ CFR. These frogs are thrashing about in their ignorance and are desperate to find a way to co-op or destroy the leaderless pagans in the TP. I’m trying to avoid attitudes such as displayed by Palter’s contempt for the TNA? Maybe we are a bit trapped by the enemedia’s deceptive web of lies and need to resist giving in to many preconceptions that have been fostered and filtered by the enemedia over many years.
Check out this terrific PJ O’Rourke writeup about his experience and the TP: http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/articles/2010-SeptOct/full-ORourke-SO-2010.html
Another great Free-Market perspective based out of Swiss-land is The Daily Bell, http://www.thedailybell.com/.
Let’s Roll!
Say what?
Bookmarked because I need a reminder that there is a ruling class in our country. The TEA party is working America, credible Red White and Blue. The things these people say and think just blow me away. A little problem called The Constitution huh? Thank God for the Framers of our country.
Pass the Chardonnay.
Any skewed CFR article written using or citing or even mentioning ‘wikipedia’ loses what insignificant validity or merit it had...... =.=
For reference purposes only:
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/CFRMembers2009.html
Yes, they are the chosen ones. ;)
“We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” - Paul Warburg, Bankster and CFR member before to the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Feb. 17, 1950
Thanks for that perspective from O’Rourke.
I agree with your take on things. The TP has folks quaking in their boots.
There’s a new player in town, and the knowns are worried about the unknowns.
I’m trying to avoid attitudes such as displayed by Palter’s contempt for the TNA?
I don't have contempt toward TNA, I respect them, and that's why I questioned why it was posted on FR.
NWO, NAU, and other 'conspiracy theories' are relevant on TNA, which means its disrespect on this forum, and the other snide comments toward their support of Ron Paul.
Sorry Palter I misread your post. I must admit to having mixed thinking about Ron Paul which I think is influenced by some of the stunts his most avid supporters seem to be involved with. Actually I am finding Rand Paul to be a breath of fresh air and possibly a real plus in leading efforts towards fiscal sanity.
....”He noted that Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), the father of the movement”...
....”Say what?”....
Say yes.
I don’t think Ron Paul is the father of anyone but Rand.
I’ve been Tea Partying since the first biggies in April of 2009...and while there’ve been RP fans attending, the majority of us didn’t come because of him or his encouragement.
FR and Rick Santelli and Rush Limbaugh were my catalysts to stand against the expansion of government.
That federal deficits produce economic growth and that free trade with low-wage countries raises Americans’ living standards are the kind of propositions that clash with the common sense of many Americans.
Right. The unwashed masses espouse quaint common-sense ideas that have no intellectual basis. Right.
Great article, thanks for posting this!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.