Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third Reactor at Fukushima Nuclear Plant Explodes
ABC ^ | March 14, 2011 | DAVID MUIR AND JESSICA HOPPER

Posted on 03/14/2011 5:27:49 PM PDT by gandalftb

There was a new explosion Tuesday morning at a reactor the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, and the company that runs the plant said water may be leaking from the reactor.

Half of the rods inside the reactor were not immersed in water and the suppression pool, which holds the water used to keep the rods cool, seemed to be damaged, according to Tokyo Electric Co. and government officials.

The level of radiation also rose around the reactor, but a government official said there was no danger.

"The radioactive level near unit 2 has gone up, but at this juncture, the level is not judged to be immediately harmful to human bodies," said Noriyuki Shikata, a spokesman in the prime minister's office.

The blast is the third at the plant in the three days since a powerful earthquake struck Japan on Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: japan; japanearthquake; nuclear; tsunami
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last
To: Freddd

I’d be shocked if a bunch of Obamaites weren’t trying to shut down all nuclear.

Last I checked Obama was against and not for nuclear power.


21 posted on 03/14/2011 5:41:51 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Via Twitter Breaking News

More on blast: Explosion may be more severe than previous incidents; containment vessel possibly damaged - nytimes

http://nyti.ms/ecVU4i

6 minutes ago via breakingnews.com


22 posted on 03/14/2011 5:42:37 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (Those who forget history, are doomed to repeat it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn

there are a lot of people poo pooing this issue but if I was in Japan I would be getting out.

8217 microseverts at the gate after the explosion tells me that radiation is leaking or gets released.

I wouldn’t trust those Power plant people until the CEO goes into the Nuclear plant himself showing how safe it is...


23 posted on 03/14/2011 5:43:20 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Agreed, there is plenty of high ground, why not put the whole plant farther inland? Amazing mistake.


24 posted on 03/14/2011 5:43:20 PM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Yeah. And The San Andreas reactor is designed for 7.5. A few times weaker than this one.


25 posted on 03/14/2011 5:43:25 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti2

“While the two previous explosions were hydrogen blasts, caused by a buildup of steam in the reactor unit, this time officials are not sure what the cause was.”

That, plus the fact that radiation is going on, seems to indicate another hydrogen blast.

The containment is still intact. If it were not, you’d expect to see radiation increasing.


26 posted on 03/14/2011 5:44:22 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
Looks like the "smart" smarties weren't so smart after all.

With the budget they had, I can think of many fail safe simple designs that would prevent this, I'm sure many could with enough time & money, which they had a'plenty.

Simply shameful, I'm not saying they should "commit" , but I understand the cultural phenome.

27 posted on 03/14/2011 5:44:23 PM PDT by de.rm ('Most people never believe anything you tell them unless it isn't true."-Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
> The problem was the tsunami swamping the diesel generators and batteries and shorting everything out. No one thought of that.......

I'll bet they thought of it. But the cost of making power plants on a coast "tsunami-proof" is astronomical. It would have prevented their construction in the first place, on economic grounds.

My guess is they just said, ignore the threat. And for 40 years they were right....

28 posted on 03/14/2011 5:44:23 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

Diablo Canyon is about 50 miles from the San Andreas Fault.

That is not “on” it.

San Francisco is ON the San Andreas Fault.


29 posted on 03/14/2011 5:45:25 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

There’s nothing to indicate that the containment is compromised.


30 posted on 03/14/2011 5:45:47 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

None of us in our lifetime will see another nuke plant built in the US.


31 posted on 03/14/2011 5:46:21 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

Given that the core temperature is still decreasing, that’s pretty much what has been happening.


32 posted on 03/14/2011 5:46:27 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I guess the dilemma is, would you tell the truth, knowing that sheer panic and chaos would ensue, or stave off panic by downplaying the threat, and behind the scenes plan for mass evacuations, but in a way that is more orderly?


33 posted on 03/14/2011 5:46:35 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DB

50 miles is on in earthquake design terms.


34 posted on 03/14/2011 5:47:03 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

I believe they made the reactor for unit 1. Units 2 and 3 were another other company, IIRC.


35 posted on 03/14/2011 5:47:16 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Chicken Little Elmo

36 posted on 03/14/2011 5:47:16 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Is Japan’s government still going to claim that everything is under control? This is a catastrophe of biblical proportions!


37 posted on 03/14/2011 5:48:52 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

The report doesn’t share your analysis. This is all conjecture.

You’d expect a spike in radiation if the containment were compromised, which hasn’t occurred.

Two, the core is subcritical now, which means that even if it were exposed, it wouldn’t be able to go critical as what happened in chernobyl.


38 posted on 03/14/2011 5:49:01 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

The tsunami wave that hit the plant measured at least 7 metres in height, compared to the maximum 6.5 metre case the plant was designed to cope with.


39 posted on 03/14/2011 5:50:10 PM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Drudge linked a Meltdown alert for reactor #2 just before the explosion. That was a full meltdown alert.


40 posted on 03/14/2011 5:50:14 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson