[WhyisaTexasgirlinPA]

“We’ll find out six months or a year from now whether people are forgiving and whether they put in context events that are 10 and 15 years old,” Gingrich said.

So he feels his adultery should be put in the past but Bill Clinton's lying shouldn't? Newt committed adultery, Bill committed adultery - the only difference is Bill got caught and lied. What would Newt have done in the same circumstance?

[OldDeckHand]

"Bill committed adultery - the only difference is Bill got caught and lied."

Good grief, not someone here, too. No, the only "difference" is that Clinton broke the law and Gingrich didn't.

Clinton, even though he wasn't convicted, was found in contempt of court, lost his license to practice law and was fined nearly $100K. Other than that, sure, there weren't any differences between what Clinton did and what Gingrich did.