1 posted on
03/28/2011 6:08:44 AM PDT by
Fennie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: Fennie
Obama received approval from NATO, the Arab League and the UN. Hard to make any case without Congressional approval.
This is an unconstitutional and unlawful intervention. Period.
2 posted on
03/28/2011 6:18:03 AM PDT by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: Fennie
On Monday night he will discuss how the mission advanced U.S interests
This morning CBS news essentially said U.S. interests = oil. I was livid and asked my wife where were all the liberals screaming no blood for oil?
3 posted on
03/28/2011 6:18:19 AM PDT by
TSgt
(Colonel Allen West & Michele Bachman - 2012 POTUS Dream Team Ticket!)
To: Fennie
I’d much rather listen to him lay out his case for why his basketball bracket is a disaster.
To: Fennie
5 posted on
03/28/2011 6:20:58 AM PDT by
FrankR
(The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
To: Fennie
Mr. President, "What should Hillary tell our other friends in the Middle East?" asks the press.
"Just tell them I am bombed Gadaffi."
6 posted on
03/28/2011 6:21:26 AM PDT by
mlocher
(Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
To: Fennie
you’ll vill listen and don’t ask questions!
7 posted on
03/28/2011 6:22:00 AM PDT by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Fennie
the burning question: What's next? If not the destruction of Israel, then just another step in that direction. [along with the continued destruction of the 50 US States, with the elevation of the 57 islamic states]
8 posted on
03/28/2011 6:23:29 AM PDT by
C210N
(0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
To: Fennie
And the MSM likely has its template already together.... “President Obama showed his astounding brilliance once again as he shared his plans for Libya with an adoring nation...”
9 posted on
03/28/2011 6:25:57 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Imagine.... a world without islam.)
To: Fennie
All:
It’s LIBYA, not LYBIA.
10 posted on
03/28/2011 6:29:06 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Imagine.... a world without islam.)
To: Fennie
an answer to the burning question: What's next? It doesn't matter to the sheeple. They just want to watch and hear and adore him.
11 posted on
03/28/2011 6:30:39 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Imagine.... a world without islam.)
To: Fennie
“O”, coping a plea to the American people over this last and most dismal performance... is like watching a guy, caught dead to rights with the big blond next door, trying to make it up to his angry wife.
Much as I'd like to see “O” sizzle on the griddle for this, I REALLY can't stomach his shtick!!! I won't be tuned in. You guys here can fill me in, tomorrow.
14 posted on
03/28/2011 6:32:48 AM PDT by
SMARTY
(Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
To: Fennie
Odds are he’ll spend half the time talking about Libya and the other half re-selling the Obamacare debacle on its 1-year anniversary.
17 posted on
03/28/2011 6:38:42 AM PDT by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: Fennie
Somebody better take away the Ronald Reagan books way from that guy
18 posted on
03/28/2011 6:40:13 AM PDT by
tsowellfan
(http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: Fennie
The case for war is very simple.
1 There is a civil war going on in Libya and one side is likely to prevail over the other, thus "slaughter" is going to be occurring.
2 As various liberal bleedinhearts have already said, there's humanitarian concerns here. We have a duty to protect people from being slaughtered.
3 In liberal thought (as they are pleased to refer to it), a duty is the same as a right. (Similarly, a feeling is a thought is a philosophy.)
4 Under the liberals' "right to protect" philosophy, we are entitled, indeed obliged, to intercede militarily (and that of course includes invasion) in order to keep the peace and prevent casualties in a civil war...anywhere, per the philosophy of moral equivalency and national pan-exceptionalism.
Thus the 0bama Doctrine, essentially may be stated:
For any nation undergoing civil war, we are entitled to attack and invade it to keep the peace.
To: Fennie
Any candidate who claims they are a Reagan Republican:
What Would Reagan Do?
Under today’s circumstances, Reagan would have kept today’s Gadaffi (Iraq) in power to keep in check Al Qaeda (Iran) which has infested eastern Libya.
21 posted on
03/28/2011 6:43:16 AM PDT by
tsowellfan
(http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: Fennie
So this will be Obama Libya Case v4.3, right? Or will he upgrade it to v5?
To: Fennie
And on the sixth day Obama saw that it was good and on the seven day he did rest. Also, he rested on the second day, the thrird, half of the fourth day. He spend the last US dollar on earth on the fifth day and then took a short nap.
25 posted on
03/28/2011 7:00:21 AM PDT by
Leep
To: Fennie
His case = "I support Islam and I want the Muslim Brotherhood to win so that a Caliphate can be reestablished throughout the Middle East..
THAT is his "reason" because he hates Israel, the Jews, Christians, and America!
27 posted on
03/28/2011 7:04:29 AM PDT by
Jmouse007
(Lord deliver us from evil and from those perpetuating it, in Jesus name, amen.)
To: Fennie
His speech, set for 7:30 p.m. EDT Monday, comes after the administration scored an important diplomatic victory. NATO ambassadors on Sunday approved a plan for the alliance to assume from the U.S. command all aerial operations, including ground attacks. Yes, surrendering command of our forces to foreigners is always an 'important diplomatic victory'. < /s>
28 posted on
03/28/2011 7:04:51 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
To: Fennie
Too little, too late...
Looks like no Jeopardy so on to HGTV for some home improvement tips...*sigh*
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson