Posted on 04/23/2011 4:26:06 PM PDT by TommyDale
Snopes' Certification of Live Birth shows supposedly issued in August, 1961 but the Revision date is 11/01. What is REALLY interesting is the light blue time stamp that reveals the actual date of issuance as Jun 6 2007. See the picture for the highlighted area showing the time stamp from the back side where it bleeds through. Hold it up to a mirror and you can see the date!
(Excerpt) Read more at msgboard.snopes.com ...
I would think in 61 they still used NEGRO. African is a PC thing and another dead give away.
That’s a nice job of a cropped picture depicting a rubber stamp that no one can tell what it is stamped on.
Race= AFRICAN shows the amateur status of the people who produced this
People averse to using the term “negro”
Kind of like the idiots who typed those fake letters about George Bush using a typewriter that wasn’t available at the time and date of the letter - and used terms that any military person recognized as fake
But hey
We STILL don’t know who took Air Focre One joyriding over Manhattan in 2009 and buzzed and terrorized the city and those poor souls at ground zero - do we?
If your still interested, Peter Boyles on KHOW has been obsessed with all this for three years. He’s on weekday mornings from 5 to 9 AM MTZ in Denver.
Trump has zer0 running scared and stupid, So many new articles just falling from the sky about zer0 being born in Hawaii and birthers being dopes.
BINGO!
Can you imagine???? Well, obviously YOU can, you DID.
Can’t forget Ol Ted Dansen saying makin whoopi with Whoopi was like tossing a hotdog down the hallway.
I’ve seen copies where the blue 2007 date is pretty clear up front.
Good point.
May I ask how this revelation is significant?
August 1961 is the date that Obama’s birth was filed with the Hawaii DoH and assigned a certificate number by some clerk.
The 11/01 Revision is the date when the printed format of all Certifcations of Live Birth were last revised. When the Hawaii DoH changes the border, state seal or the fields to be printed on a particular form, in this case the Certification of Live Birth form, they issue a document revision date which is then printed at the bottom of all such forms printed until they make a change and issue a new revision date.
The June 2007 date is when the Hawaii DoH certified this particular printing of Obama’s COLB.
If Obama requested another certified copy of his COLB from the Hawaii DoH, the “Date Filed” would still be August 1961. The light blue datestamp would be whatever date the department printed and certified the additional COLB. The “Revision” date at the bottom may or may not be different. That would depend on whether or not the department has modified the border, seal, or selected fields since 11/01, which is highly likely.
Boyles calls the Obama COLB a “politically correct forgery” referring to the race on the document that says “African.”
I was thinking the same thing. Negro was the word used back then. I don’t remember what year it changed to black. Maybe late 60’s? Early 70’s?
There are whites in Africa as well. How can “African” be a race?
“In the lower left corner it has “(Rev. 11/01)Laser”. What’s that all about? Who gets their birth certificate revised”
I think that means the form itself was revised in 11/01 not just Obama’s.
The African instead of Negro is really bizarre.
I'm surprised some serious researchers haven't completed this task by now.
Me, I just kibitz, I got nothing.
“I would think in 61 they still used NEGRO. African is a PC thing and another dead give away.”
____________________________________________
I agree, but he is mixed, or mulato.
It was quite sometime past the early sixties that the term
African American was coined, but I still refuse to use it.
The Obots CLAIM that one could specify whatever they wanted
to be listed as race, but I think that is BS.
The Obots, of course, can never give an excuse for Bozo’s refusal to release a REAL birth certificate.
My thought exactly...does ANYONE have their race listed as 'North American' on THEIR BC???
He speaks American too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.