Replies

I’m defending the US Constitution and the principle of original intent.

Nonsense, you are defending 0bama!

It's quite obvious to anyone with half a brain, that the founders of our country did not intend for someone with multiple allegiances to become the future leader of our United States!

You are not fooling anyone. If you were truly defending the Constitution, then you would instead be focusing on how 0bama is not following the Constitution. Shame on you!

Re: Obama's birth and qualifications for the presidency
Vanity | May 1, 2010 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 05/01/2010 1:22:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

One of the constitutional requirements for the office of the presidency is that he be a "natural born citizen." This was put into place by the founders to keep foreigners or persons who do not bear a non-questionable allegiance to the US Constitution out. Obviously, and admittedly Barack Hussein Obama was born to a foreign citizen and is not 100% American. He's half-American, half-African and all Marxist. He obviously bears no allegiance whatsoever to the US Constitution and is working overtime to destroy it. He's a usurper and should be removed from office. He is exactly the kind of fraud/usurper the founders feared.

"If you cannot live with the above, fine, but keep your mouth shut about it while on FR. Don't fight against us on ANY of our deeply held beliefs!!"

I have attacked Obama on many issues, but he meets the Constitutional requirement of natural born citizen. The problem isn’t the Constitution, but the idiot voters who put a follower of Rev Wright and Bill Ayers in office.

And under the law, Obama is a full American citizen - just as Rev Wright is. Rev Wright hates America with a passion, but no one claims he isn’t a NBC. If the voters had chosen, they could have put Rev Wright in office.

The problem with Obama isn’t his birth, but his politics - and we need to beat him in the political arena. NO COURT WILL RULE OBAMA INELIGIBLE! We win at the ballot box, or we will not win at all.