Posted on 04/30/2011 8:37:33 PM PDT by Triple
Last night I came across a comment somewhere about the way the typewriter prints an “n” and an “i”. The “n” is used to measure the space for each of the letters and even though an “i” is a much thinner letter it takes up the same space as a letter “n”. Therefore every time you find an “ni” or an “in” combination there should be a definite space between the two letters. A computer will move them together so they are very cozy. If you look at 0’s new BC at words like Kapiolani and university and a few others that have this combination you will find the cozy letters. If you look at the other BCs from the same time period that we know were type-written you find the little space. This is another example of a little detail that the “20-something idiots” and “ignorant kids” who have never used a typewriter would probably not know about and would not think to correct. Amazing—just like Dan Rather’s nemesis!
“the Senate Resolution on McCain.”is a JOKE.
Denninger makes some good points. Primarily his "absence of chromatic aberration" argument and the question of where the AP got their version.
Adobe Acrobat (most likely used to reduce file size) can either distill text to imbedded fonts or optimize text to an image. Clearly the later option was chosen. Thing is those chromatic aberrations would remain on the background layer just as they did in the test sample from the National Review.
He sums it up nicely here....
Could I scan an image in color and then make this (chromatic aberration) "go away" in an image program? Probably. Why would you? The intent of the release, remember, is to produce an actual image of a physical document and the claim made was that this was a copy of a physical piece of paper.
///You know how many cities will burn if the truth came out? Civil War II would be under way, and the international community would side with the Obamites as we who presented the truth would be called “racists wishing to return to the days of slavery.” ///
Uhhh, so is that chaos your concern or is it your plan? Or are you still thinking this one through? I’m always curious as to how people see motives, actions and results.
I agree with ya ...its over except for the fat lady singing....Michele?
However if and its a big IF ....if there is some agreement amongst experts that the tech stuff shows a fraud its another batch of cats.
What a leftist tool you are.
You’re not even making the least bit of sense.
You've just had your butt beaten by at least a dozen posters on this thread.
You're wrong. Man up and admit it.
What do you think? I want the truth, the consequences be damned.
He posted a copy of his certified copy (assuming he actually received one) and posted a scan-into-pdf of his certified copy.
Copies of a certified copy have no value.
Pay attention...
=8-)
He’s right. The judges and politicos really don’t have the fortitude to do the right thing. They would likely let the Constitution be amended by political correctness, or by judicial activism, instead of being original constructionist by abiding to the meaning and intent of the US Constitutional framers.<<<<
The original intent of the Constitution is in the hands of the People - the Patriots - The government is fast becoming a totalitarian monster and everyone in it are complicit in
the destruction of the Last best hope for Freedom the world
has ever known. 2012 is the end if the people do not rise up
and dissolve this government.
I’m here in North Central Texas, WTC.
I’ve noticed for the past couple of weeks that you seem to be making excuses for the lame rhetoric and phony documentation that the Obama crowd has been spewing; OR, not otherwise pointing out fallacies in that BS.
What’s up with that? Are you suddenly believing all of the BS put out by the Obama administration? Do you really believe he was born in the US to two people who were US citizens?
Not pickin’ a flame war here, but want to understand why you seem to support so much of the flim-flam released by the WH nerds recently on various threads.
Obama is a thin skinned mulatto with low self esteem. He tries to compensate by being a big talker in front of big crowds, saying things he knows are not true (lies) and making “promises” that will never occur.
See #94.
It doesn’t matter whether the kid’s parents were married or not.
The Constitution refers to birth parents.
There are hundreds of thousands of NBCs in the US because both parents were US citizens and the kids were born in the US. That’s why so many baby mamas don’t marry. They get more welfare money from taxpayers for every kid they hatch.
Considering your position that the BHO latest release of a purported BC may be valid because original documents were destroyed after being digitized into computer files...
Why is it that I can go to Ancestry.com and view the military registrations for WW I, or the census records from the 1840s? ....I believe it’s riduculous to think that a US State would destroy valuable historical records, just because they transcribed them into computer data.
That is a lame excuse by Hawaii and the Obama administration, to try to explain the childish latest release of a COLB instead of a long form BC with all the info.
BOTH your parent must be US citizen at the time of your birth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.