Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tickerguy: 1, ObaBots: 0 (proof of LFBC fraud)
Market-Ticker ^ | 4/29/2011 | Karl Denninger

Posted on 04/30/2011 8:37:33 PM PDT by Triple

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-330 next last
This is an article by the guy with the youtube video that shatters any notion that the PDF image the White House posted was done as they said - without *some* electronic editing.

(My apologies not not being better at HTML.)

1 posted on 04/30/2011 8:37:37 PM PDT by Triple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Triple

Well, the images did not come through - any help from HTML savvy freepers appreciated.


2 posted on 04/30/2011 8:39:21 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple

I think are missing a very important point. To be a natural born citizen, BOTH your parent must be US citizen at the time of your birth. The birth certificate obama released proves that his father was not, thus obama is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This is no conspiracy. Even if obama is born in hawaii, he still not qualified to run


3 posted on 04/30/2011 8:40:36 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple

The doctor’s name on a separate layer is the key.

Case closed.


4 posted on 04/30/2011 8:43:34 PM PDT by ILS21R ("Every night before I go to sleep, I think who would throw stones at me?", she said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Sooo..where’s Trump on this? I thought he’d have his people tearing this apart by now, and would be screaming 24x7 about what they found.

Wondering if Trump was a setup - create cover for release of the BC, then say “yep..that settles it! Guess he was born here after all”..

Hmmmm..


5 posted on 04/30/2011 8:44:45 PM PDT by jstolzen (All it takes for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
Unfortunately, that argument isn't going to go anywhere. The best hope to discredit our liar-in-chief is to consistently show he is a liar.
6 posted on 04/30/2011 8:45:03 PM PDT by Carling (Obama: Inexperienced and incompetent, yet ego maniacal. God help us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Unfortunately, in doing so, he proved that I'm correct.

See, the issue isn't layers.  Yes, the layers are suspicious, but they're not the smoking gun.  The smoking gun is that there are no chromatic artifacts in the Obama document, but the document is allegedly a color scan of an actual piece of paper, and we know it had to be a color scan because the background is allegedly color safety paper.

National Review's document, unsurprisingly, is a scan of a color document.  How do we know?  Because if you simply pull it up in your web browser (which will open the embedded Acrobat Reader) and zoom it up, you will see this:

Note the chromatic aberration.  This document is in fact a color scan.

And here is a blown-up piece of the so-called "scan" of Obama's document:

Note the absence of chromatic aberration.  The Obama White House document is not an unaltered color scan.

Folks, this is physics.  It is "how things work."  It is why you see rainbows.  Light always is refracted slightly differently depending on wavelength when it goes through a lens - as is necessary to focus it so as to make an image. 

Could I scan an image in color and then make this "go away" in an image program?  Probably.  Why would you?  The intent of the release, remember, is to produce an actual image of a physical document and the claim made was that this was a copy of a physical piece of paper.

The Obots were all over me yesterday with the claim that "well, it could have been an electronic copy."  No, it wasn't.  Beyond the fact that certified copies are always printed to paper and then authenticated (e.g. with a raised seal) there is documentary evidence that Hawaii did exactly that.  Look here.  Hawaii produced photocopies - not electronic copies, photostatic copies of the original.

7 posted on 04/30/2011 8:46:48 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Triple
<Img src=http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?get_gallery=1583>

gives you this...


8 posted on 04/30/2011 8:48:00 PM PDT by TankerKC (I feel 271 degrees out of sync today, which isn't half bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Deninger is of course correct that the thing ‘released’ by barry bassturd’s minions is a composit and not a photocpy of an actual paper document. Deninger also notes that Hawaii has vouched for this fraudulent ‘release’. Therefore what was shown to the public has now become either the official Hawaii source data, or the most blatant insult/in your face/piss on the American people for questioning bassturd’s credulity/I won so I can do as I please, laws be damned. Frankly, the amatuerish state of the forgery tells me it is the latter ... We The People have been shown in no uncertain terms that the law we think exists, only applies to we peons not to the democrat oligarchs and their feckless Pubby enablers.


9 posted on 04/30/2011 8:48:54 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

That’s not correct, is it? His mother was a citizen, and he was born in the US. That makes him eligible.

Assuming the docs are real, of course. Which is far from a given.

Then there’s the other thing. That is that nothing will be done anyway, even if he isn’t eligible.

You would need cast iron proof, and even then, the case can be dragged out interminably if they want.


10 posted on 04/30/2011 8:48:54 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

I agree with you - if these documents represent the truth, they prove Obama is ineligible. Obama’s father was *never* a US citizen.

I also hold the view that there are troubling elements with the images that were released, and Karl Denninger points out these issues with the images very clearly. I recommend everyone find his youtube video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c93cm17_2C8


11 posted on 04/30/2011 8:49:09 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Triple

img src=”http:www.whatever.com”

enclosed in: < >


12 posted on 04/30/2011 8:49:18 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

A conspiracy of one.

What would happen to Obama and the DNC if it were proved he was not eligible to be POTUS?

He is fighting for his very life.

Others are fighting for billions if not trillions of dollars.


13 posted on 04/30/2011 8:51:23 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Race? Obama is only 1/16th Black. He is 1/2 Caucasion, 7/16 Arab. He has an Arab name not African.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

that is the first image - would you mind doing that for the second one?

Thanks


14 posted on 04/30/2011 8:53:38 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

that is the first image - would you mind doing that for the second one?

Thanks


15 posted on 04/30/2011 8:53:38 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

I’ve read at several places, BOTH parents must be US citizen at the time of obama’s birth. Yet romney lawyers seem to think you only need one. Obama 2008 resolution which he voted for also define natural born citizen as both parents must be US citizen for Mccain. Also a 1898 court intepretation also ruled that you only need to be born on US soil to be natural born citizen.

Obviously theres a lot of different intepretation, But those who believe in following the original constitutional meaning will can only draw that obama indeed is NOT a natural born citizen


16 posted on 04/30/2011 8:54:38 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Triple
National Review's document, unsurprisingly, is a scan of a color document.  How do we know?  Because if you simply pull it up in your web browser (which will open the embedded Acrobat Reader) and zoom it up, you will see this:

Note the chromatic aberration.  This document is in fact a color scan.

And here is a blown-up piece of the so-called "scan" of Obama's document:

Note the absence of chromatic aberration.  The Obama White House document is not an unaltered color scan.

Folks, this is physics.  It is "how things work."  It is why you see rainbows.  Light always is refracted slightly differently depending on wavelength when it goes through a lens - as is necessary to focus it so as to make an image. 

17 posted on 04/30/2011 8:54:55 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Race? Obama is only 1/16th Black. He is 1/2 Caucasion, 7/16 Arab. He has an Arab name not African.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

A natural born American has 2 American parents. The man Obama claims as his father was Kenyan. No matter where Barry was born, his Kenyan father makes him ineligible to be POTUS.


18 posted on 04/30/2011 8:55:13 PM PDT by TheConservativeParty (PALIN 45 The cure for "meet the new boss, same as the old boss.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Triple

The National Review has some brilliant folks...but they apparently are just about as tech ignorant as the Obamaloon crowd. Methinks they just want to get the birth thing out of the say so they can argue other things.

Fine...but they’d better kick the repulsicans in the Obama-end and get some candidates out there......

We don’t want no stinkin’ RINOs. (Ya hear that, Romney?)

We don’t want no stinkin’ “old” repulsicans.

We definitely don’t want ANYONE who’s even spoken to McCain in their lives.


19 posted on 04/30/2011 8:56:00 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple

All of you computer-savvy Freepers will love all the comments on the Market-Ticker source site. Go there — these people talk your kinda language. Have fun lots to read.


20 posted on 04/30/2011 8:56:43 PM PDT by bunster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-330 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson