Skip to comments.
Bin Laden was asked to surrender before being shot
Times of Malta ^
| May 2, 2011
| not stated
Posted on 05/02/2011 7:10:49 AM PDT by UniqueViews
Osama Bin Laden was asked to surrender by US troops before he was shot dead, Fox News is quoting intelligence sources as saying.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesofmalta.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: binladen; binladendead; binladenshot; osamabinloser; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
To: kiltie65
The picture flying around is a fake. It’s a composite of 2 images.
121
posted on
05/02/2011 10:31:54 AM PDT
by
TheZMan
(Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
To: UniqueViews
Had bin Laden been captured, it would have been one of the greatest intelligence coups of all times.
Akin to snatching Hitler during WWII.
The interrogation would have produced 24 carat gold.
What was his network?
How was command control and communications set up?
Who were his backers?
Who were his contacts?
Did he have contacts with foreign intelligence agencies or other Jihadi groups?
Just having his version of Al-Qaeda’s creation would have provided amazing insight on how the organization operates.
And the PSYOP value.
Imagine video showing bin Laden cowering, with weapons pointed at his head begging Americans for mercy?
What would his supporters have thought if bin Laden was shown shackled and in a cage looking tired and defeated?
Anyways....
I bet the only people happier than Americans that bin Laden is dead, is the Saudi and Pakistani government.
122
posted on
05/02/2011 10:58:18 AM PDT
by
PanzerKardinal
(Some things are so idiotic only an intellectual would believe it.)
To: itsahoot
-——Who gets the reward?-——
The word on the street is Chicago SEIU local 69
123
posted on
05/02/2011 11:00:20 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
To: manc; All
why not injure him and bring him for questioning and getting all the info out of him and then putting him on TV looking like a right useless sap. The info on banking, money, future attacks is all gone and if we had watched him we could have found his number two with others. Why the hell did we dump his body to respect his religion of 24 hours?
Great points all, esp. the first; the official story is complete bs.
124
posted on
05/02/2011 11:08:33 AM PDT
by
notdownwidems
(Vote Republican! We'rewhy not injure him and bring him for 1/10 of 1% better than the other guys!)
To: Thane_Banquo
Respectfully disagree. They could have just sent him to Gitmo, no ACLU around.
125
posted on
05/02/2011 11:12:45 AM PDT
by
notdownwidems
(Vote Republican! We'rewhy not injure him and bring him for 1/10 of 1% better than the other guys!)
To: notdownwidems
126
posted on
05/02/2011 11:17:43 AM PDT
by
manc
(Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
To: UniqueViews
I assure you they wanted him alive and healthy in Gitmo.
They would have taken him alive if it were possible.
127
posted on
05/02/2011 11:31:05 AM PDT
by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: bill1952
If he even had the number of bodyguards of, say, a Mafia boss, rather than a couple of couriers, a woman, and his brother, this could have gone down differently.
A security detail is difficult to hide and in itself is a tipoff. And once you know the detail is there you just up the manpower in the assault team to overpower it.
Bin Ladin was trying to be inconspicuous and it worked - up until the SEAL team arrived.
What I find interesting is that he was living in a Pakistani garrison town and yet nobody from the garrison showed up during the firefight to investigate the shooting.
Of course just the fact he was living in a Pakistani garrison town is interesting.
129
posted on
05/02/2011 11:46:00 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(Democratic Underground: The Hogwarts of stupid.)
To: TroutGuy
Lol...
You wont find too many Christians in that group.
To: notdownwidems
Respectfully disagree. They could have just sent him to Gitmo, no ACLU around. A round of 5.56 NATO costs maybe a dollar. A trial costs tens of millions. The SEALS made the right choice, IMHO, and they should do the same to all the other trash at Gitmo.
131
posted on
05/02/2011 12:35:07 PM PDT
by
Thane_Banquo
(Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
To: UniqueViews
I heard reports that we caught him dressed in panties and stockings. Hey, my sources are secret, so you’ll just have to take my word for it.
To: UniqueViews
I just listened to the Obama’s speech again, and noted he said “after a firefight, they killed OBL”. The sequencing struck me: “after”? Maybe they did neutralize all other threats in the building, gave him a chance to surrender, and being armed consented to “suicide by SEAL”.
133
posted on
05/02/2011 12:45:39 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
To: ctdonath2
Why even release the details right now, just say he’s dead, and that’s that.
To: CommerceComet
I don't doubt there was a firefight but I'm guessing the first shot was to Osama's head and no one knew the Seals were there until that shot was fired. A firefight likely ensued but Osama was already at his new residence, the pit of hell, where he will spend all eternity. It could be that Osama was shot by one of his ISI "handlers", under orders to not permit Osama to be taken alive if there was a snatch attempt.
135
posted on
05/02/2011 12:50:12 PM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: dfwgator
Because it’s vital to the Obama’s ego. “I...me...my...” can only be prolific if there are details to claim.
136
posted on
05/02/2011 12:50:43 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
To: rlmorel
” I would like to think that a Patriotic Navy Seal, upon seeing OBL stick his hands up and say Dont shoot! I surrender! simply said Not on your life. and fired a single shot into Bin Ladens forehead.”
Or gave him a Dirty Harry, are you feeling Lucky ???
POW .... NO.....
To: AppyPappy
I bet the Pakis gave him up.I don't think so. The dirty bastages were covering for and hiding him....in plain site!
138
posted on
05/02/2011 3:12:51 PM PDT
by
Road Warrior ‘04
(I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
To: Cheburashka
I’m amazed the SOB wasn’t living in LA, teaching at a state university. We’d never have caught him.
139
posted on
05/02/2011 5:07:37 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: annieokie
I just read on UK Daily Mail Online that one of the Seals had a camera on his helmet, and Obummer, Biden and a bunch of others watched Bin Laden, his son, and wife get gunned down on a live feed as it went down.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson