Posted on 05/03/2011 7:01:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
He has made it clear on many occasions that he is talking about the oil cartels, the ones who depend for protection on the U.S. military. That is why he believes we have a right to demand stable pricing. Many refineries are operating at a loss.
As someone who was never famous once said, “who gives a rats arse” what the NRO has to say on any given subject!
The Check Pants GOP wants to throw another election for Obama just like in 2008. This is why they want Trump out of there.
They know Trump could get elected.
After all Trump just forced the hand of Obama on the COLB and the OBL. Both done within days of each other. This of course after Trump was pounding Obama on it and Obama’s poll numbers were tanking.
We gotta hang together, or...else...
Very true. There can be no retreat; any retreat will be a retreat into slavery.
Trump did obama a favor by dragging as many Conservatives as he could to the birth issue and NOW he wants out.
The minute he started throwing the F bombs around he knew it would result in people moving away from him.
He’s not going to run, his work for obama is done and he wants to go back to his crappy ‘reality’ show.
I’m not saying he’s serious, and I’m not saying I’d vote for him in the primary. But.... evidently in large scale business negotiations (for instance with the Chinese) yelling, bluster, and profanity are so common as to be the order of the day. Otherwise you’d be viewed as a wimp.
Nah....Trump will announce his candidacy....as a Democrat running against Obama in the primary. I doubt the Democrats would be conducting a discussion like this at all, so Trump will fit in there just fine.
Plus, think of the fun he’ll be having in the primary debates. Think how many Democrat voters will be agreeing with him every step of the way, especially when they find out some of his past positions.
I wonder how many of his supporters in here would vote Dem if Trump was the Dem nominee in the end? Any at all? Most of them? It would be interesting to know.
The sissyboy RINO’s at NRO desperately want to change the subject away from the issues that Trump is raising.
I don’t care that he used the words so much - certainly most of us are mad enough to do the same - but they can now be used by the left (who ironically aren’t offended) as sound bites against Trump should he run.
Shows poor judgment or no intention to run.
Prager better not read the Nixon transcripts. Or hang out with Marines. A lot of people swear, just how it works.
RE: Prager better not read the Nixon transcripts. Or hang out with Marines. A lot of people swear, just how it works.
Prager knows about the Nixon tapes. That’s why he said this in the article :
“There is a world of difference between using an expletive in private and using one in a public speech. For those who do not see the difference, think of the difference between relieving oneself in private and relieving oneself in public.”
“Think how many Democrat voters will be agreeing with him every step of the way, especially when they find out some of his past positions.”
Military on the Mexican border
Wants ObamaCare repealed
Pro-Life
Pro-Israel
Wants to take the economic fight to the Chinese
Iraq’s oil
Already forced Obama to show the Birth Certificate
Lower tax rates
Against gun control
Against raising the debt ceiling
Fill administration positions with competent people not political appointees.
Will undo Obama World Apology Tour
Wants the rest of the world to fear us
Pro-traditional marriage
Christian
No 911 Mosque, too insensitive
Drill ANWAR
Jobs, Jobs, Jobs
Never held elected office
Loves America
Knows better than to introduce a Win The Future (WTF) slogan
And, my favorite in-your-face,
Pi$$es off Karl Rove
Nixon wasn’t really in private was he, not only were other people in the room and he had the room bugged.
Yup, that’s our choice. F-bombs or Bob Dole.
By “past positions” I meant that he was once a Democrat himself, and donated freely to Democrat politicians.
As for your list, that’s my point. I know a lot of people who vote Democrat routinely, but are hunters, Christians, pro-marriage, think the country’s debt is out of control, are in favor of more jobs, love America, etc.
Trump would appeal to a lot of middle of the road Democrats in a Democrat primary. The looney left, no, but a lot of the rest would at least consider him, especially after the way the economy’s performed under Obama and his minions.
As for his winning the Republican slot, forget that dream. He didn’t have a chance even before he unloaded his “F-bomb” speech. Politically, He IS a clown. The comb-over alone should tell you that. Besides, we don’t need our own narcissist.
The media gave us Bob Dole and John McCain. They’d love to also saddle us with Donald Trump. Not going to happen though. But it would be fun if he turned the tables on them and ran as a Democrat. Love to see the first polls on that one.
You think the media is pushing Trump to run?
I disagree with his opinion this time, as well as his argument.
This business of language is complex and unsettled. The O.E.D. lists the word. Exposure to the word for the last 50 years, in increasing frequency at all social levels should NOT have allowed that word in the Official Dictionary of the English Language.
The Urban Dictionary exists for that purpose for us sheltered types who have a genuine need to know how phrase "Tea Bagger" morphed from a term in use by perverts, to a term of derision against the Taxed Enough Already activist movement.
In the heat of outrage it is understandable how an ubiquitous word might be almost appropriate. I believe absolutely that this is a word much used and abused in Washington DC and other capitals routinely, at all levels.
Disqualification for office? Not necessarily. Lying relentlessly is more insulting to the spirit.
There are acts much more obscene than this word which we are forced to accept daily from the current holder of that highest office.
That we personally do not revert to use of the word is commendable. To give it more weight than it deserves is sophistry at its best.
Yes.
I would consider it an improvement.
So many tend to confound the means with the ends.
Presently, diplomacy demands that we support our enemies financially without question.
Let them criticize our language, so long as they fear us.
The zenith of diplomacy, the UN, has been in the pocket of the sandmaggots for years. A few F bombs would be preferable to the many N-bombs that could follow.
What a silly question!
Evryone knows "WTF" stands for "Win The Future."
The Annointed one said so.
Do you always have your mind in the gutter?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.