To: little jeremiah
Look at it this way. The idea of Mohammed, however you spell it, is what is being implemented by the naming of these children. Muslims are ALL over the world, and they may implement things slightly differently, but the one connecting thread is this idea of the Prophet. This is what I'm talking about. Others here can quibble about spelling, etc., but the very fact that, including the variations, this name is #1 means there is a very very bad problem in Britain. They can whistle past the graveyard, stick their heads in the sand, but in the end, they aren't reproducing enough to keep their historic demographic makeup competitive - BIG PROBLEM!!!! Finally, just think about Gaddaffy...how many ways do you spell his name? Many huh? Still the same damn guy.
49 posted on
05/08/2011 9:09:58 AM PDT by
Gaffer
To: Gaffer; the scotsman
We are in complete agreement. It was the scotsman who was quibbling, saying that Mohammed was not number one (but was if one takes into account the variant spellings).
52 posted on
05/08/2011 10:17:57 AM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: Gaffer; the scotsman
53 posted on
05/08/2011 10:22:26 AM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: Gaffer
No, we DONT have a ‘very very very bad problem’.
Stop believing the hype that we are a dhimmi conquered nation. The Muslim pop. of Britain is 3%. We are not nor are we ever going to be a Muslim nation.
What I find frightening is that Americans seem to now believe any old crap they read or hear about Britain.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson