[the scotsman]

No it is not!.

It is no 16. And all that means is that almost all males born to a small minority of Britain have been named Mohammed. So it is 16 only because of mass naming by a small religious group!.

And it is only number one if you tortuously include every last variation. And if you have to do that, then its clearly NOT number one, is it?. In fact, take away the varations and its nowhere near number one!.

The true no 1 name in Britain is Anglo-Saxon or Celtic, as are all the other names.Neither no 16 nor no 1 prove anything about a Muslim conquest of Britain, Limeys are dhimmis, yada yada yada....

All the ridiculous hysteria about this story frankly proves only how stupid, gullable and hysterical some Americans seem to be these days.

[Gaffer]

Look I realize you're obviously over sensitive about something you don't think is a problem. However, if this were the case on "this side of the Atlantic" I'd be damned concerned, however 'tortuously' varied you consider the variations to be. It still indicates a dire problem. If you're not concerned, it's no skin off my back, you're the one that will be saddled with the problem when you're too old to deal with it.

If you have a problem about the specificity of the facts/reporting take it up with your newpapers, e.g., the Daily Mail UK, not me fella.