Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China 'will not match' US military power - general
BBC News ^ | 18 May 2011

Posted on 05/18/2011 8:59:11 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

China has no intention to match US military power, a top Chinese general has said.

Speaking in Washington, Gen Chen Bingde said America's armed forces remained far more advanced than China's despite considerable progress by China in recent years.

But Gen Chen warned that further US arms sales to Taiwan could damage US-China military relations.

China regards Taiwan as a renegade province that must be reunited. 'Gaping gap'

"China never intends to challenge the US," Gen Chen, chief of the General Staff of the People's Liberation Army, said at the National Defense University during his week-long visit to the US.

"Although China's defence and military development has come a long way in recent years, a gaping gap between you and us remains."

But Gen Chen warned that US-Chinese relations would suffer if Washington again sold weapons to Taiwan.

"As to how bad the impact will be, it will depend on the nature of the weapons sold to Taiwan," he said.

Last year, Beijing cut off most military-to-military contacts with the US after Washington announced more than $6bn (£4bn) arms sales to Taipei.

Gen Chen's visit to the US has drawn a strongly favourable press in China - a signal of the importance that the Chinese authorities are now placing on better military ties, the BBC's defence correspondent Jonathan Marcus says.

But there should be no illusions, our correspondent says, as superficial harmony inevitably masks significant underlying tensions.

The aim of China's extensive military modernisation, he adds, is to extend its military reach well beyond its own shores and to potentially neutralise weapons systems where the US has a dominant advantage.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2011 8:59:13 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

2 posted on 05/18/2011 8:59:37 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I call shenanigans.

OK, I call BS. I read a book written by the Chinese General Staff on their plan to dominate us. Gee military was a big part of that.

Sun Tzu would be proud. Ahem, some of us have read him here.


3 posted on 05/18/2011 9:05:37 PM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Missing tanks, small arms, artillery, mortars and Reserves on that chart. I thibj the balance would tip to China when those are factored in. Taking ground and holding it is important than air and sea weapons systems.


4 posted on 05/18/2011 9:05:59 PM PDT by Redcitizen (In case of economic breakdown, make sure you have a case of Snickers candy bars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Not for a while.


5 posted on 05/18/2011 9:06:19 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

Naw. China can’t really project their force beyond their sphere of influence in Asia.


6 posted on 05/18/2011 9:07:23 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

U.S. Military power is Chinese military power. They are paying for it. We are using their dollars to fund it. We don’t own anything. We are bankrupt. We own our military might the same way a mortgage holder ‘owns’ his home.

Of course they will never attack us. They would be blowing up their own stuff.


7 posted on 05/18/2011 9:07:23 PM PDT by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican


8 posted on 05/18/2011 9:07:43 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Trying to match the US will mean ending up like the USSR. Having enough capability to deter US influence is good enough for them.


9 posted on 05/18/2011 9:08:32 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 240B
Of course they will never attack us. They would be blowing up their own stuff.

Yep. It's in China's interest when the Americans intervene in the Middle East in order to secure that oil is being supplied to oil-thirsty nations.

10 posted on 05/18/2011 9:08:57 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

A general from Communist China? Why of course I believe him.


11 posted on 05/18/2011 9:09:48 PM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Of course their goal is not to match our power. Their goal is to exceed our power.


12 posted on 05/18/2011 9:10:28 PM PDT by Waryone (RINOs, Elites, and Socialists - on the endangered list, soon to become extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

If they decide to walk troops over to the Middle East for oil and establish a presence there, the US would be hard pressed to dislodge them.


13 posted on 05/18/2011 9:11:49 PM PDT by Redcitizen (In case of economic breakdown, make sure you have a case of Snickers candy bars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06

I don’t ever see a Chinese invasion of the USA, but I expect they will want us out of Asia and would like to be the hegemon of their part of the world. Then they certainly would have the potential to make things unpleasant for Japan and Russia.


14 posted on 05/18/2011 9:12:14 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Why should they try to match us when they can literally wait for the US economic implosion in the form of a national/sovereign default and then come in and take what they want? /s =.=


15 posted on 05/18/2011 9:16:11 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

The Chinese making things unpleasant for Japan would have a particular historical significance, which I am most certain the Chinese would relish.


16 posted on 05/18/2011 9:17:01 PM PDT by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
I don’t ever see a Chinese invasion of the USA

That's why you are only Colonel Kangaroo.

General Kangaroo would know better.

The Chinese mindset is not 10 or 15 years, but hundreds.

17 posted on 05/18/2011 9:19:14 PM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

They don’t want to match us, they want to surpass us, both militarily and economically.


18 posted on 05/18/2011 9:20:34 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06

A Chinese invasion of the USA would have to overcome the stopping power of water, distance and the general tendency for the offense-defense military balance to significantly favor defense. The country that has the most to fear from China is Russia.


19 posted on 05/18/2011 9:31:37 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

Nah, when it comes to all out war between superpowers, it’s that staggering 240 nukes vs 9,400 nukes that China is no position to equal or neutralize any time soon.


20 posted on 05/18/2011 9:33:20 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson