I don’t understand why, when I was talking about how Cain, due to his elite credentials, might appeal to establishment Republicans who are currently supporting Romney, you choose to talk about another candidate? Very odd behavior.
I’m noticing that Ron Paul is #2 in New Hampshire behind Romney, since you brought him up. Ron Paul is also #2 in Texas behind Palin. More Freepers would support Ron Paul than Mitt Romney. (Most would support Sarah, if that was a choice).
I’m paying Cain a compliment, by simply pointing out that, because he was Chairman of the Kansas City Fed, establishment Republican voters will appreciate Cain’s elite resume. That’s a good thing. Cain can get more votes for Cain by taking them from potential Romney supporters. I’m saying that Cain has excellent elite credentials. I’m not criticizing Cain.
You seem to want to be arguing with someone else, or against a different set of words.
you’re not criticizing Cain?
well, you are attributing things to him that are NOT accurate. I happen to know Herman, and it is crystal clear that YOU do NOT know him.....
but good luck on that Ron Paul campaign of yours....