Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snowrip

No I am not wrong. You are seeking to use the govt to pick and choose what lawful behaviors people can participate in.

That is a progressive concept. If you’re using the money angle ALL things are connected. Which is why the progressives use it.

So Comrade, what other behaviors will be unapproved? hunting? Sky Diving? Scuba? Target Shooting? Religious worship?


108 posted on 05/31/2011 1:48:13 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

Yes, you are wrong. Please show where I said that the government should make ANY behavior illegal, or that the government should pick and choose ANY behaviors that anyone can participate in.

What I DID say was that the taxpayer should not have to foot the bill for someone else’e poor choices, and that people should take more responsibility for their actions... and if I recall correctly, self-reliance is one of the cornerstones of conservative thought. Are you honestly trying to insinuate that public benefits should be awarded to those who refuse to take responsibility for their own actions, no matter how great the cost? How progressive of you.

For example, I am a hunter. If I am shot while hunting, should someone else be forced to pay the bill? Of course not.

I think you should probably review my posting history before making a fool of yourself like that again.


113 posted on 05/31/2011 2:22:54 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson