[Joe Brower]

Enemy action ping.

Exactly as we have predicted here for some time now. The Hegelian Dialectic in full effect.

Doom on these treasonous bastards.

[mbynack]

I suspected that this was the motive all along. They prevent the system from working in order to condemn it as ineffective.

I think it's a great reason to implement government control, not gun control.

[Dick Bachert]

No nation can tolerate treason,
for traitors are never in season.
But Obozo’s on course,
with Marx as his source,
and when asked, smirks and says “I’ve my reasons.”

[Noumenon]

Right on the money, Joe. And here's the thing about Hegelian triangulation, as I like to call it. The Wikipedia entry sas that, "

The formula, Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis, does not explain why the Thesis requires an Antithesis. However, the formula, Abstract-Negative-Concrete, suggests a flaw in any initial thesis—it is too abstract and lacks the negative of trial, error and experience."

But there are other even more important issues to consider. First, the thesis-antithesis dynamic works best for the Left if one or poth of the opposing pair consists of a strawman argument - and that's one the areas in which the Left excels. The second flaw in the whole thesis-antithesis-synthesis trope is that once hijacked by strawman arguments or other fallacies, it allows the originator to re-frame the whole argument, usually substantially to the left. The corrupt users of this trope are counting on never having any of their premises challenged or their strawman fallacies exposed. That's why we we must always disrupt the method by doing precisely that. The howls of outrage and name-calling are the signs that they've lost the whole argument.

[smoothsailing]

Thought maybe you’d be interested....

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=70d6a3d3-0e2f-4465-9b59-9e0f78b4f0e0