Replies

>>You’re either uninformed or dishonest. If Palin is running<<

Thanks for making my point. I am neither uninformed nor dishonest. I am informed and been 100% honest. Your DISAGREEMENT with my analyses makes me neither, but it does (as with so many of your ilk) put you in the camp of “I don’t have a rebuttal argument but ad hominem always works against people who disagree with me.”

>>there are legal reasons she cannot announce it, yet.<<

And those are? (please provide links, so I may migrate from the uninformed to the informed like you).

>>By the way, look at the massive exposure the eneMedia gave Duncan Hunter during the 2008 election (/sarc). Sarah Palin has them jumping through their own butt-holes in lame attempts to damage her image.<<

Hey, if you think this is a brilliant manipulation of the MSM/LSM and the American Public, more power to you. Make that your argument and defend it accordingly.

So far, all you have submitted is “I like ‘Sarah’ (your term) and anyone who says otherwise is... (see earlier list)”

>>By the way, who is giving her exposure? Name one other individual that has had been vetted as much as she has. If we were to sift through your work email account, would you come out as clean as Palin? Palin isn’t gaming the media; they’re gaming theirselves!<<

I made that point on a different thread. Microscopic examination isn’t “vetting” - it is just irritating to all. This is a repeat of your prior point that Gov. Palin is working the MSM/LSM. But what is the real result of that gamesmanship? How does it garner votes? Does it irritate more than attract? Those are valid questions, none directed at you nor Gov. Palin.

I bemusedly prepare for your “how DARE you” response... (unless you surprise me...)

Your DISAGREEMENT with my analyses makes me neither, but it does (as with so many of your ilk) put you in the camp of “I don’t have a rebuttal argument but ad hominem always works against people who disagree with me.”

Easy there little fellow. If you are informed, you would realize there are legal reasons Palin cannot announce her candidacy. Clearly, you either knew about the legal issue or you did not. You either are uninformed because you didn't or you're dishonest because you did. So, you are either uninformed or dishonest. If I say you are one, I'm the other; but if I say you are neither, I'm both. ;-)

Hey, if you think this is a brilliant manipulation of the MSM/LSM and the American Public, more power to you. Make that your argument and defend it accordingly.

Would you rather see her behave like the feeble, spineless GOP insiders? I want a leader who damn well acts like a leader. A leader fights back when appropriate.

But what is the real result of that gamesmanship? How does it garner votes? Does it irritate more than attract? Those are valid questions, none directed at you nor Gov. Palin.

Again, would you rather see her behave like the feeble, spineless GOP insiders? I want a leader who damn well acts like a leader.

I bemusedly prepare for your “how DARE you” response... (unless you surprise me...)

Again, settle down little fella. Nobody is out to get you. Some time ago, I gave you a remedy to treat severe cold system. I'm sorry, I've got nothing to relieve your PMS.