To: sickoflibs
That is not true, every thing gets cut not just Defense, it s across the board. Are you telling me there is nothing in Defense that cannot be cut? That’s why I prefer the Mack-Paul plan anyway.
63 posted on
08/02/2011 10:55:13 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
To: Perdogg
That is not true, every thing gets cut not just Defense,I think the problem is if cuts are made 50% of the cuts must come from defense. It is not across the board. If they really wanted to cut across the board then all they had to do was freeze budgets at last years level. We can never get ahead of these guys as long as there is baseline budgeting.
87 posted on
08/02/2011 11:23:00 AM PDT by
itsahoot
(--I will vote for Sarah Palin, even if I have to write her in. --He that hath an ear, let him hear.)
To: Perdogg
I prefer the Mack-Penny plan .
I’d like it if it were the Nickel plan.... much better.
154 posted on
08/02/2011 11:32:33 PM PDT by
TomasUSMC
( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
To: Perdogg; expatpat
RE :"
That is not true, every thing gets cut not just Defense, it s across the board. Are you telling me there is nothing in Defense that cannot be cut? That’s why I prefer the Mack-Paul plan anyway."
So you are saying the trigger cuts to defense are pretty minor compared to the overall defense budget??
Some libs on MSNBC are claiming this is a victory for Obama, I heard $400B defense cuts over ten years added to a $600B trigger as $1T total cuts possible and they said that was 10% I think.
170 posted on
08/03/2011 11:06:39 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson