Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Speaker Boehner Announces Appointments to Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction
The Speaker's Official Website ^ | 08/10/2011

Posted on 08/10/2011 8:50:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Speaker Boehner Announces Appointments to Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction

Washington (Aug 10)

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) today announced his intent to appoint the following three lawmakers to represent House Republicans on the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction:

House Republican Conference Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX)

House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI)

House Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI)

Speaker Boehner has tapped Chairman Hensarling to serve as a co-chair of the joint select committee. Boehner issued the following statement regarding the appointments of Chairmen Hensarling, Camp, and Upton:

“Our debt and deficits are a threat to our economy, and America cannot achieve long-term job growth until we take action to address this crisis. In the weeks ahead, a serious, bipartisan committee of lawmakers will begin the hard but necessary work of making the tough choices needed to rein in mandatory and entitlement spending, which are the drivers of our debt. The lawmakers I have appointed to serve on this joint committee are proven leaders who have earned the trust and confidence of their colleagues and constituents. They understand the gravity of our debt crisis and I appreciate their willingness to serve on this panel.

“The two parties have fundamental differences about government and its proper role in our society. Where we've been able to agree, we have acted, and in a way consistent with the American people’s desire for a smaller, less costly, and more accountable government. Still, the differences remain, and so does the urgent work of returning our economy to creating jobs and lifting the crushing burden of debt that threatens our children’s future. This joint committee presents an opportunity for both parties to bring to the table their best ideas, debate them on the merits, and ultimately come together to do what’s best for our country. With all that’s at stake, I expect that the joint select committee will conduct its work in the open and transparent manner the American people deserve.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Michigan; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: boehner; camp; catfoodcommittee; congress; davecamp; fredupton; hensarling; jebhensarling; johnboehner; jointcommittee; selectcommittee; supercommittee; supercongress; upton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 last
To: SeekAndFind
Any chance they can seriously put a cap on what the
Obamas spend on travel since so much security is required and staff? There's got to be an embarassing total running for all of their separate and joint excursions. I understand the First Caboose sneaked out this week w/a daughter to parts unknown...
201 posted on 08/10/2011 6:18:53 PM PDT by CigarettesGolfandIceCream (THE three things he has done consistently since sworn in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDB
When Camp and Upton “get primaried,” Boner will have to re-appoint two more “red shirts” (Star Trek cannon-fodder guys).

Upton's faced primaries a few times. Jack Hoogendyk gave him a race in 2010. I hope he tries again. Jack's a good guy and a former state rep.

202 posted on 08/10/2011 6:19:27 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (I am not lead by any politician. I am my own leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

If I expected this panel to accomplish anything I might care but since I don’t I won’t.

Come on, Patty Murray? Reid knows there will be nothing accomplished with her on this panel. It is set up to fail.

Obama is already threatening an end run around this Super Panel by repealing the Bush tax cuts. He knows tax increases are dead.

I mean it you want something to happen you don’t put in that brain-dead harpy.


203 posted on 08/10/2011 6:21:13 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Jack Hoogendyk tried to beat Upton in 2010. I’d like to see him try again. The new district has northern Allegan County as well, which is the heart of Dutch Country.


204 posted on 08/10/2011 6:22:30 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (I am not lead by any politician. I am my own leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The constitution does not allow Congress to form a committee whose recommendations cannot be debated or amended, but must be either passed or rejected and rejection triggers across the board cuts that also cannot be debated or amended.

This is not like past commissions like Simpson Bowles from last year or Bush’s Tax Reform Commission that simply made recommendations. If this committee’s recommendations are not approved, congress is forced to accept something else.


205 posted on 08/10/2011 8:26:39 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Day 41 and the Freepathon is still on. Please donate today.
Click it.

206 posted on 08/10/2011 8:46:20 PM PDT by RedMDer (Abolish FReepathons. Be a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Impy; Marine_Uncle
RE :”The constitution does not allow Congress to form a committee whose recommendations cannot be debated or amended, but must be either passed or rejected and rejection triggers across the board cuts that also cannot be debated or amended.

Its real simple. The committee makes recommendations that the two Houses can either independently choose to ignore, pass, reject or modify. Nothing unconstitutional there.

Last week the three branches passed into law a conditional/delayed set of budget cuts, nothing unconstitutional there.

Any congress can pass a law getting rid of the cuts or changing them, nothing unconstitutional there

It is perfectly constitional because it doesnt force or stop the congress from doing anything. Dont like the cuts?? That is why we get a vote.

207 posted on 08/10/2011 9:13:00 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: 08bil98z24; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385; mkjessup; ...
RE :”Some of our more brilliant posters here on FR enjoy over using many words in the course of a day ... examples (RINO, Communist, Socialist, Unconstitutional, Illegal and so on)

Here's the most common use of those words you cite above that I have observed:

Socialist : ‘ A Democrat

Communist: ‘ A Democrat that says that Obama is too conservative or is a conservative

RINO :’ A Republican we strongly disagree with or don't like

Unconstitutional :’ A law we don't like

Illegal :’A poor Mexican or from similar country in America that is here illegally or was born here to a mother that is here illegally

208 posted on 08/10/2011 9:33:58 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Socialist : ‘ A Democrat ’

There is a strong correlation.

209 posted on 08/11/2011 1:12:17 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Budget sins can be fixed. Amnesty is irreversible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Another very abused word on FR is “populist” (thanks to Limbaugh).


210 posted on 08/11/2011 1:52:54 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Budget sins can be fixed. Amnesty is irreversible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Boehner should’ve considered bringing McCotter in.


211 posted on 08/11/2011 5:41:22 AM PDT by equaviator ("There's a (datum) plane on the horizon coming in...see it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Actually I totally agree with you, except I am concerned that the Dems on the committee will conspire with the RINOs McConnell and Boehner put up to control the committees and end the Bush Tax cuts, and impose taxes on small businesses and corporations which will drive more American jobs overseas.

More tax money is to government as cocaine is to an addict. IOt just feeds and encourages a habit with no limits or bounds.

Another thing about this committee which worries me is it may move on to OTHER issues and try to get OTHER types of Statist Legislation approved.


212 posted on 08/11/2011 6:36:10 AM PDT by ZULU (McConnell and Boehner are the Judas and Ephialtes of the 21st Century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty
Upton's faced primaries a few times. Jack Hoogendyk gave him a race in 2010. I hope he tries again. Jack's a good guy and a former state rep.

Thanks a million, Darren! It was such a pleasure to read Jack Hoogendyk's blog and bio. He's one of the many millions of Americans who are going to turn this country around from the foul-smelling abyss that Barky and his pals have tried their utmost to take us down.

213 posted on 08/11/2011 8:20:56 AM PDT by CDB ("...the liberals' praise is a warning bell you must heed. Trust me on that." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; Churchillspirit
According to Fox this morning, Ryan ASKED not to be put on the committee.

As he has impressed me so far as a bright guy, I find the story completely believable. The ‘committee’ appears to have only two possible outcomes - fail or sell us down the river. (Well I guess three possible outcomes since I would never put it past the politicians to find a way to do both.)

214 posted on 08/11/2011 10:26:03 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: StonyMan451; sickoflibs; AuH2ORepublican
The House has the constitutional right to make its own rules, and that's what they've done.

Exactly. We aren't helped by claiming unconstitutionality when it's not warranted. Opposing the bill on it's merits will do just fine.

215 posted on 08/11/2011 2:25:06 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson