Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner: We’ll waive the Republican response to Obama’s jobs speech (Res Ipsa Loquitur)
Hotair ^ | 09/07/2011 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 09/07/2011 11:24:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

At one time, opposition parties had to demand air time for responses to presidential speeches given to joint sessions of Congress. Those mainly consisted of State of the Union rebuttals, because Presidents don’t normally ask for joint sessions except to speak on matters of high moment, such as declaration of wars or celebrating the end of them. Now, however, the rebuttal speech has become such a pro forma event that a waiver sends a message all its own (via the Drudge Report):

Boehner spokesman Mike Steel said Obama’s proposals on Thursday “will rise or fall on their own merits,” suggesting a GOP response was not needed.

“Republicans are, and have been, entirely focused on job creation. Every member of Congress, and — more importantly — the American people, will provide a reaction to the president’s address,” Steel said.

Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said there will be “plenty” of response to the president’s speech on Friday, but told Fox News he suspects the reason there’s no formal response is “the speaker doesn’t expect to hear much to respond to.”

In the early days of demanding opposition party responses, the accusation was that rebuttals were petty political acts. Now, according to Nancy Pelosi, refusing to rebut the President is an insult:

Pelosi said the party’s “silence” would “speak volumes about their lack of commitment to creating jobs.”

“The Republicans’ refusal to respond to the president’s proposal on jobs is not only disrespectful to him, but to the American people,” Pelosi said.

It’s now disrespectful to refuse to disagree with Obama? That takes “dissent is patriotic” to a whole new level, doesn’t it?

Boehner has played this well. He maneuvered Obama into a Thursday night address just before the NFL season opener, which means that fewer people will bother to tune in Obama and his demand for Porkulus II: Economic Boogaloo, and fewer would have stuck around to watch a designated Republican remind people that Obama’s “new” plan failed in 2009 when he had three times the funding for it. By waiving the response, Boehner bolsters the impression that Obama won’t be saying anything new at all, thus hardly requiring a response anyway.

Boehner also knows that the Republican presidential hopefuls will garner a lot more attention with their rebuttals than he will from a House anteroom while Green Bay and New Orleans kick off. Why not let the headline-grabbers make the case that Obama’s simply recycling his failures instead of formulating a new economic approach? Republicans in the House will have plenty of time to rip the proposal apart when it comes to Congress — assuming, of course, that it ever does come to Congress. Obama’s deficit reduction plan outlined in an April speech is still only seen on the sides of milk cartons in Washington DC.

What do you think? Disrespectful, masterful, or something in between? Take the poll:


CLICK ABOVE LINK TO TAKE THE POLL



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehner; jobsspeech; johbboehner; jointsession; obama; stimulus2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Why would anyone respond to BS and hot air? Obama is a liar first class and an incompetent first class as well as being very un-American.


21 posted on 09/07/2011 11:35:00 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I think the response should be a quick 90 second spot showing pictures of Obama at the various companies he's visited and touted, then overlaying the text “Bankrupt x/x/2011”.
22 posted on 09/07/2011 11:35:44 AM PDT by al44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama will prattle on for the better part of an hour ... the hour leading up to the kick off. Any rebuttal would be competing with the game itself ... the pubbies won't be sucked into that situation.
23 posted on 09/07/2011 11:36:01 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ve always thought rebuttals were dumb anyway, but in this case, I don’t think the repubs have any better ideas than obumer anyway.


24 posted on 09/07/2011 11:36:25 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
[4] Answer not a fool according to his folly,
lest you be like him yourself.
[5] Answer a fool according to his folly,
lest he be wise in his own eyes.
(Proverbs 26:4-5 ESV

It's interesting that a response or no response both have possible benefits and consequences I think Speaker Boehner is playing this the right way.

25 posted on 09/07/2011 11:36:34 AM PDT by sonrise57 (Help us God for evil men have surrounded us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
Dadgummit, John! When the people are being lied to, silence isn’t golden!!

Different strategy is being used here. Instead of the usual partisan BS, the GOP is silent, making some people think for once in their lifetimes.

26 posted on 09/07/2011 11:36:34 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
.

.

Boogaloo Economics

.

.

27 posted on 09/07/2011 11:37:14 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Wonder if they are going to have the mixed crowd in the chamber like before? Remember when had the sitting arrangement with the Republicans and Democrats sitting with each other instead of Dems on one side of the aisle and Reps on the other side?

If they stay with the traditional way, there will be more sitting and not applauding. That will show up BIG TIME as the cameras pan out over the two sides of the chamber.

28 posted on 09/07/2011 11:37:39 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
I hope one of the the candidates tonight addresses Obummers speech and give a PRE-REBUTTAL with sound ideas and thoughts for jobs through the PRIVATE SECTOR!
Perhaps this is the reason for the non-rebuttal... to open up the floor to the candidates.

If so... good move.

29 posted on 09/07/2011 11:38:24 AM PDT by samtheman (Palin. In your heart you know she's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I like this idea. After Obummer fails, the talking heads on the MSM would just be focusing on what the GOP said to take attention away. As it stands, no one will watch this garbage and at the end, the MSM will be forced to discuss the egg this loser laid in this speech. The next day when people check in to see if anything happened, the MSM will be hand wringing over the rotten performance.


30 posted on 09/07/2011 11:38:31 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

That hand is too deathly white to be Boenhers. Looks like McCain’s hand.


31 posted on 09/07/2011 11:39:06 AM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This speech is going to be so ho hum, same old, same old, why would you even dignify it with a response. Plus there will be plenty of republicans around taking questions afterwards that can respond should Oblame-o go bat spit crazy with his blame games and finger pointing. Oblame-o could go completely off the tracks tonight and if he does, let him take himself down in flames.

He deserves absolutely no respect from anybody. And old crazy Nancy Pelosi is relevant to what?


32 posted on 09/07/2011 11:39:33 AM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Boner will be crying too hard to make any statement. Dork!


33 posted on 09/07/2011 11:39:38 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
As Abraham Lincoln said

"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."

This is where Zero is at - the more he talks the more foolish and petty he appears.

There is no need to respond to Zero's tripe.

34 posted on 09/07/2011 11:40:04 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No real reaction to 0bama is needed until he puts his plan in writing and it is scored by the CBO.


35 posted on 09/07/2011 11:40:19 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hillarious!

The talking heads will be reduced to “the GOP doesn’t have a jobs plan, “the GOP is disrespectful,” (or some such idiocy), and “the GOP didn’t do a rebuttal, what does that mean” and completely go off the rails on Obama’s jobs bunkum.

The MSM is screwed in all directions on this one.

Bravo!


36 posted on 09/07/2011 11:40:35 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They don’t need a response. They just need to add a laugh track.


37 posted on 09/07/2011 11:41:15 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

Indeed, why comment on something that’s already been said before -

more government spending on “infrastructure”
more government spending on “unemployment insurance”
more government spending on “green jobs”

as a matter of fact, they ought to “pre-comment” on these issues, knowing that that’s all it will be about.


38 posted on 09/07/2011 11:41:19 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Interesting move by Boner. Curious to see how it plays out.

I believe his name is spelled "Boehner," though I'm sure they spell it your way over on DemocraticUnderground.

39 posted on 09/07/2011 11:42:33 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rush is ‘responding’ to 0bummer right now.


40 posted on 09/07/2011 11:43:23 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Hope & Change - I'm out of hope, and change is all I have left every week | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson