The Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Show Thread - Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The EIB Network ^ | 09/28/2011 | Rush Limbaugh

[CSM]

Just got back to hear Rush discussing the GOP deferring to the USSC regarding Obamacare. Yep, it was so successful to take this same approach to McCain-Feingold.....

ooops

[sloop]

i disagree

i don't think bachmann is a liar

[workerbee]

Yup.

I predict it will pass the SC.

[upsdriver]

I also have to say I find it a bit disconcerting that the Supreme Court would rule on any issue emotionally. That is wrong no matter which side is applying it.

[advertising guy]

the dyke said durin conformation she would recuse if

[IMissPresidentReagan]

I fear you are correct, since it all hinges on Kennedy, who is nothing more than a glorified Souter.

[advertising guy]

it is unconstitutional and for the supremes to allow it dents the constitution for a lifetime

ain’t gonna happen

[sloop]

i remember that

hope she keeps her word

[IMissPresidentReagan]

That explains why the Warren court and Justice Brennen especially were so wrong about soooo much. ;)

[workerbee]

she would recuse if Purple pigs fly outta my ..?

[upsdriver]

I agree Bachmann would like to but she doesn’t have the wherewithal to accomplish it as president. Her best job is to remain in the house and work to repeal it there but we’ll need a president that will lead on this issue.

[sloop]

aight - if the dyke recuses herself and the vote is 4/4, does the lower court ruling stand? (being only the individual mandate is tossed)

[advertising guy]

depends of the definition of the word pigs

lol

[IMissPresidentReagan]

I agree with your analysis, however, with Kennedy being the swing vote, I am fear the “good guys” lose this one.

[RJS1950]

The idea that once this is implemented that there is no going back because it is an entitlement is bull. If it is illegal then it is stopped and swept away. Are some going to be hurt? Possibly. The Constitution did not prohibit slavery so it was a right of plantation owners to own slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation and the subsequent Constitutional amendments took all of their “entitlement” to slaves away. If der Fuehrer signed a bill tomorrow that muslims are entitled to invoke sharia law and perform honor killings would it mean that it could not be swept away because it is unconstitutional and illegal. Illegal and unconstitutional have meaning. We as a country could do away with SS, medicare or any other entitlement. This is all about politicians not wanting to piss off some constituency that they or someone else has lied to.

[workerbee]

When at least 3 of them WANT exactly that — for the Constituion to be “dented”...?

[sloop]

bachmann is the ONLY one fighting obamacare

[upsdriver]

Yep

[advertising guy]

Kennedy is exactly who I had in mind.....these Supremes know the very seriesness of this......and emotional decisions would make a Supreme a laughin stock for life

Kennedy wants to be important ,not a laughin stock

[sloop]

the scotus defines legal and illegal - no matter what anyone thinks

we need courts that will rule on the law and stop worshiping at the altar of precedent