Posted on 10/05/2011 12:37:45 PM PDT by winoneforthegipper
Nicolle Wallace deserves every slur that can be heaped up on top of her.
She may very well be one but that’s a side issue. And it really is vulgar. Vulgar is different than obscene.
Memo to Wallzce: This kind of crap only adds the the number of miles I’d be willing to crawl over broken glass to vote for Sarah Palin.
They fear once Governor Palin has a firm grip on that megaphone, her words will resonate We The People igniting that enthusiasm once again.
Sorry, I don't look at words the way you do.
However, if this was a different forum....like perhaps a bathroom wall, my adjectives would be quite more repulsive.
So for dramatic effect let's just say Nicole won't be greeting any used jihadists anytime soon!
That POV seems to be creeping into a lot of things today.
But enough of this. Your thread is about a GOP elitist and not language usage. :-)
Yeah....can I use that word towards the GOP?....lol
“President Palin is coming, and she’s bringing America with her!”
From your lips to God’s ears.
Fortunately they forced those 24,000 pages of Palin’s emails public. Counter the their intent, the contents showed that she was a competent, even-keeled and high-minded political executive.
My contempt for the likes of NW, whom I wouldn’t trust to either know what’s good for the economy or know who would be good for the economy, is nothing more than she deserves.
What could be better story line than to have her triumph over do-anything-to-win Mitt before vanquishing Obama?
Party rules control that. Usually, the parties formally select their candidates at a nominating convention, and that is usually partly controlled by primary elections and other operations run state by state.
But, if after the general election, a named candidate withdraws (and that is permitted), or becomes unavailable, the party has complete control over naming a replacement. The voters picked a PARTY, and a slate of party electors; not presidents or vice presidents. The names of the nominees typically appears on the general election ballots as a "convenience" to the voter.
OK, she is running. You don’t get attacks like this (as in non stories spun to make you look negative) if you are not.
Thanks for the info. I’m sure there’s good reasons for doing it that way. After all, we don’t keep 20 million lawyers around in this country for nuthin’.
George Wallace apparently was right......THERE’S NOT A DIME’S WORTH OF DIFFERENCE!
LOL
LOL
LMAO
ROFLMAO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.