Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Can somebody explain to me, why it should cost so much to run a campaign? For what? It seems to me in this day and age of the Internet, you can get your message out without having to spend a ton of money.


10 posted on 10/14/2011 8:16:11 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

Radio and TV airtime, staff, travel. It’s one thing to campaign in one state, but a nationwide schedule is very expensive.

Don’t fight it, just accept it. Herman needs our cash or we’re going to have a choice between Romney and Obama.

The Dems will use Wall Street, mormon racism, and Romneycare to ruin Mitt. He is the most vulnerable candidate in the GOP race, and he’s the one they want and will likely get.


18 posted on 10/14/2011 8:21:43 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

RE: It seems to me in this day and age of the Internet, you can get your message out without having to spend a ton of money.

The IRONY of our age is we have faster communication, better information dissemination, great technology to receive knowledge, YET, we have just as many if not MORE ignorant people.

Why? BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE JUST PLAIN LAZY. They’d rather be spoonfed information.

We have better eduational facilities here in the USA but our kids aren’t any better educated than those in say, China.

They don’t want to go through the rigours of thinking about the ramifications of say, the 9-9-9 plan. Instead, they prefer the 30 second sound byte.

*THAT* is why it is very expensive to run a campaign.

IT COSTS MORE to pay for an effective 30 second (even if deceptive) sound byte.


25 posted on 10/14/2011 8:28:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

It never fails to amaze me how many mailings we get from candidates which go straight to the trash. That has to cost a small fortune for a national mailing. That alone could probably be eliminated.

With the internet, I think Cain can run a campaign that will end up changing the basics of campaigning. As another said, it’s amazing what he’s accomplished with minimal funding.


28 posted on 10/14/2011 8:29:46 AM PDT by meatloaf (It's time to push back against out of control government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

There are idiots like my sister out there who only know what they see on TV. Ads are enormously expensive plus bumper stickers and yard signs. The things Cain needs for name recognition.

Or, if you’re a Democrat, you need a few mil to pay the homeless, crooks, and illegals to vote. You also have to pay off organizations like Acorn to flood the voter rolls with fake registrations. The list goes on.


33 posted on 10/14/2011 8:31:14 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

Television. You have to respond to negative ads, for one, and to create story for yourself as well. “Top of the mind” awareness for the voting booth, because a lot of voters, even in the primaries, know little about the candidates but rely of “what they’ve heard” from television ads.


93 posted on 10/14/2011 10:48:11 AM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson