Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
Even research that isn't deliberately fraudulent is suspect.

Most scientific papers are probably wrong

4 posted on 11/03/2011 5:56:18 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum; reaganaut1

I suspect fraud is much more common in this and similar fields than anybody wants to admit.

In fact, it’s virtually a policy. I once worked with someone who was finishing a doctorate in sociology. For her final project for her dissertation, she couldn’t get enough interviews, and in fact could get virtually none that bore out her thesis. So her advisers just told her to “extrapolate” (i.e., make it up). She did, defended it in a room full of people who had probably all gotten their degrees through such fraud, and got her doctorate.


12 posted on 11/03/2011 6:36:27 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Even research that isn't deliberately fraudulent is suspect.

That's been the case for a long time. Over 30 years ago I was assisting professors doing research, and it was all about "what will get grant money?" and "what will get my grant renewed?"

It's all about the $$$, and a big part of getting the $$$ is giving the people who give you the $$$ what they want to hear.

16 posted on 11/03/2011 7:08:28 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Civilization is unnatural. It is a whim of circumstance. Barbarism must always ultimately triumph.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson