Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At What Point Will Herman Cain Be Held To Sarah Palin Standards?
Business Insider ^ | Nov. 2, 2011 | Glynnis MacNicol

Posted on 11/03/2011 12:36:48 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: SatinDoll
If Cain doesn’t know much about China’s nuclear capabilities, and it is entirely possible that he doesn’t, my answer is “So what?”

______________________________________

Sorry but there is a difference between not knowing much and not knowing anything about the nuclear capabilities of our probable number one opponent for trhe remainder of this century. While one would not expect him to know the President of every back-water country it is unsettling that he sees China as trying to acquire the nuclear capability that they have had for almost fifty years. That kind of stuff will get him chewed up in a general election debate.

81 posted on 11/03/2011 6:28:25 PM PDT by moose-matson (I keep it in my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: moose-matson

He isn’t in general election debates yet.


82 posted on 11/03/2011 6:50:23 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: okie01

OK..................Screwed up big time. All this time I thought he was katie’s father.

so where did the hatred I read come from? It was all there hatred of Alaska, hatred of the people of Alaska, and hatred to the core of Palin?


83 posted on 11/03/2011 6:55:03 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Obama is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Tim Tebow....me likey!

If Cain isn’t nominated I’m writing in Tebow!

Thanks for the idea.


84 posted on 11/03/2011 6:59:08 PM PDT by GatorGirl (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: W. W. SMITH
so where did the hatred I read come from? It was all there hatred of Alaska, hatred of the people of Alaska, and hatred to the core of Palin?

It's not inconcivable that the hatred stemmed from being a liberal.

As a liberal, Katie would hate Palin. As a liberal woman, Katie would really, really hate Palin.

And, as Palin was from Alaska, Katie would hate Alaska and all who lived there.

If there was more to it than that, I've no idea what it might've been.

85 posted on 11/03/2011 7:05:43 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: rob777
The phrase “nuclear capability,” applied to a nation, refers to its military’s possession of nuclear weapons.

Apart from the extreme nitpicking going on there who decided the above laughable criterion? Nuclear powered ships aren't considered a part of a country's 'nuclear capability?'

86 posted on 11/03/2011 7:10:00 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

“...Tim Tebow will be available in January”

Of what year ???? It would have to be January of 2024, the first election after he turns 35, and he was born in the Philippines. Otherwise, GREAT idea !!


87 posted on 11/03/2011 7:12:53 PM PDT by EDINVA (We Can't Wait, either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Apparently, you stopped reading too soon:

"However, tonight on Fox News, Cain’s chief of staff, Mark Block, explained that Cain was, in an inelegant formulation, referring to “the nuclear capability China is getting for their submarines and aircraft carriers.” But this clarification doesn’t do much to help Cain: China launched its first nuclear submarine, part of the Han-class of attack boats, in 1974. In 2004, it launched its class of nuclear-powered ballistic-missile subs, which are capable of launching the strategic nuclear weapons China already had.

Moreover, Cain erred in saying that China is developing “more carriers like we have”: The Chinese navy currently has no carriers, except for an essentially unarmed rusting hulk, the Varyag, purchased from Russia and now on sea trials for training purposes. China is starting to develop aircraft carriers, but, at first, they will be conventionally powered, not nuclear, ships. This is according to the Chinese themselves: They are planning to build two 50–60,000-ton mid-sized aircraft carriers, similar to the Queen Elizabeth–class carriers that the United Kingdom is currently developing, with nuclear- powered ships possibly to come later. Nuclear aircraft carriers would, unlike the production of more nuclear submarines (on which the intelligence remains murky), be a big step for China toward a blue-water navy, meaning one with an independent global range. A nuclear-powered Chinese carrier would be extremely worrisome, but it is not a near-term possibility for China, the rest of whose navy is nowhere near blue-water capability.
"
88 posted on 11/03/2011 7:58:26 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rob777

That was the nitpicking I was referring to. The funny thing is it essentially contradicts itself on nearly every point.


89 posted on 11/03/2011 8:28:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: magritte
Cain wandered around on the China nuclear thing and gave an opening to the “he doesn’t even know...” about China.

Only to you Perry trolls.

Read the original post here and get up to speed.

Cheers!

90 posted on 11/03/2011 8:38:04 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Hardly. Hale Boggs was Cokie Roberts dad, not Katie Couric's.

Oh snap!

91 posted on 11/03/2011 8:49:50 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
If Cain isn’t nominated I’m writing in Tebow!

Cute idea, but in the two party system we are stuck with, any failure to vote for the Republican nominee (including in favor of writing for a legitimate third party candidate) is essentially a vote for Barak Obama.

92 posted on 11/03/2011 8:52:54 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I know....I was kidding.


93 posted on 11/04/2011 4:11:30 AM PDT by GatorGirl (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If foreign policy experience is important, I hope all of you voted for Gore in 2000 over Bush!


94 posted on 11/04/2011 5:53:29 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Cain for President - Because I like the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big bad easter bunny
Herman Cain is sort of the republican version of Barack Obama, in the sense that everyone thinks he's kind of cute and gives him a pass when he fumbles the ball on an issue. We have to use big padded gloves on him. "Hell, he's never been a politician, man. Cut him some slack, he'll learn."

I don't buy into that garbage with either Obama or Cain. We elected an inexperienced rookie in 2008 and we're about to do it again? Two back-to-back guys with virtually no experience in government? One, a community organizer and professor (with minimal junior Senator credentials,) and another who led up a bunch of fast food companies that employed predominantly uneducated minimum wage workers.

I think Americans are dumber than hell. That's what I believe.

95 posted on 11/04/2011 8:40:32 AM PDT by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson