But either of the two is enough to disqualify. I think it to be more prudent to focus on the one with the highest probability of success. The Birther issue has been lost.
If you recognize that there is such a thing as an “anchor baby,” a child born in the United States to illegal aliens, then you recognize that just being born here is enough to make you natural born.
The "birther" issue has not been tried. To the extent it has even been introduced, the response from the WH was to issue a patently defective document. That was in a real sense another wagging of a finger.
I think it to be more prudent to focus on the one with the highest probability of success.
The removal ssue will only be resolved via impeachment and conviction. During the 2009 Joint Session of Congress each and every member of Congress had full knowledge that he was reported to have a foreign father and they gave him a pass. Do you expect them to now reverse themselves with the excuse the issue was not legally settled in 2009, when it in fact it was? Would that not be similar to arguing "it depends on what the definition of 'is' is"?
Do you not agree that if a non-domestic birth is established, it is immediately game over?