Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot
What is the use of focusing on "his birthplace" unless it is for the purpose of impeachment?

To prevent him from being reelected, which is what this thread is about, you would know if you had read the first sentence in the original post. All of my references have been to that subject, you brought impeachment into play.

31 posted on 11/04/2011 11:52:04 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.

You are correct, I introduced impeachment because it is relevant to our exchange on this thread.

Notwithstanding state election laws that do not clearly set out the two elements of NBC, imagine the difficulty and time required to start from the begining and litigate the foreign father feature of a candidate.

When and if it does reach the USSC, is there not clear precedent established by the irresponsible action of the 2009 Congress? Wrap that action with a loose definition of the 14thA; what is the likelihood of the court holding every member of the 2009 Congress was mistaken?

My argument is that it seems very likely an impeachement will be required to reverse the effect of the 2009 Congress.


39 posted on 11/04/2011 1:36:57 PM PDT by frog in a pot (The IRS denies tax deductions to our domestic terrorists. Why the hell do we not just deport them ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson