So now it is a “he said, she said” proposition. The question is “why now?”. Is she doing this on principle, that a would be womanizer should not be President? What is the point of the accusation now? She is taking a big risk coming out and making this accusation, which is why Cain can’t just ignore this.
Check out her political contributions and orientation.
The answer to your question of “why now” is because he wasn’t a threat to Obama before now. I’m still going to vote for him anyway.
“What is the point of the accusation now? She is taking a big risk coming out and making this accusation, which is why Cain can’t just ignore this.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA She’s taking a RISK!?? ROFLMAO
What’s the point of her doing this now? Lemme think real hard,,,,how about same as it was when she got the settlement in the 90s, Money!! Benjamins, scratch, bread, dough, greenbacks.
Next question,,
Ignore it if she has no proof. He responded to it with proof as solid as hers. She says he touched me,, he unequivocally says “i didn’t touch her”. That is the response.
BTW,, if you have never experienced a psycho chick, im very happy for you. They lie about everything, for any reason, or sometimes no reason at all. THAT is why it’s called psycho. If she offers no proof,, no more response. And no,, a settlement is not proof. Thats telling a psycho, if you will go away, we will give you slightly less than it costs to litigate your claim,,, because we know the jury might include other radfem radioactive psychos.
We know how much the Dems object to this and, thus, would want to protect the office of the presidency from sexual assaulters . . . oh, wait . . .
Interesting timing.
This story was almost dead when Gloria Alred and Sharon announce their 1:30 Presser at mid-morning!