Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/08/2011 9:40:35 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

If only Nixon could go to China, only Obama could nuke Iran. You sort of need the Nobel Peace prize to have enough gravitas to perform such an act.


2 posted on 11/08/2011 9:42:55 PM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
who writes this crap? I don't recall when I've seen any foreign policy analysis so wrong on so many levels. This is breathtakingly wrong.

Now, having said that... I agree that only Obama COULD nuke Iran and get away with it politically. But it ain't going to happen and this analysis is simply full of crap on practically every paragraph.

3 posted on 11/08/2011 9:47:04 PM PST by Lloyd227 (Class of 1998 (let's all help the Team McCain spider monkeys decide how to moderate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Obama Might Nuke Iran

BS. To nuke anyone you must have cojones, and our president has proven ... he has none. Moochell mayhap, but she is not president.

4 posted on 11/08/2011 9:48:36 PM PST by doc1019 (If Romney is our choice, I refuse to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Obozo will likely resort to some kind of “Wag the Dog”.

Iran? I doubt it. He would never nuke his muzzie brothers. Especially the basis for the califit.


5 posted on 11/08/2011 9:51:45 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Zero knows only one play on the Iranian situation. It is the punt.

There will be no military action to stop Iran from gaining nuclear weapons, there will be talk, talk, and weak, useless sanctions at the most.

Our president is a coward AND he, like all Democrats, has no interest in actually doing anything to forward American interests.


6 posted on 11/08/2011 9:52:09 PM PST by A message (The concern trolls are very,very concerned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Obama bowing before the king of Saud would indicate to me, if he’s Muslim, he’s Sunni.

So yeah, it would be no problem for him turning Iran into a sea of glass.


7 posted on 11/08/2011 9:55:06 PM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Right, and Curtis LeMay was a Quaker pacifist.


8 posted on 11/08/2011 9:58:11 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Somehow, I'm unimpressed with Mr. Rothkopf's opinion.

For example...

From a domestic political perspective, right now Obama's strong suit is his national security performance.

Who but a whacked-off academic believes that? Or this...

That said, it would be a mistake to think this President would make such a cynical analysis. Should he act on an issue like this, he will do so without making any political calculus.

This President is all about making self-serving cynical political analyses.

Iran and their impending nuclear capability are a vital issue. It deserves better than this nattering drivel.

9 posted on 11/08/2011 10:01:34 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Never happen. Not from the administration that turned the War on Terror into an “overseas contingency operation” and redefined terror attacks as “man-caused disasters”.


11 posted on 11/08/2011 10:33:24 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Thanks. On an evening of gloomy political news that article was laugh-out-loud funny. When did the AZ Conservative get a new nom de plume?
12 posted on 11/08/2011 10:43:54 PM PST by FredZarguna (I think this friendly approach has been what 0's already been trying for nearly three years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I´d like to see the Kenyan heap nuclear destruction on Iran. It would be very educational, I´m sure.


15 posted on 11/08/2011 11:35:23 PM PST by onedoug (lf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Nick, where in this article does it suggest that 0bama might nuke Iran? I read the whole thing and saw nothing even hinting at that.

The headline is misleading.

Quite frankly, it has always been my contention that the only way to halt Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, let alone regional hegemony, is to drop one or more nukes on them. Iran is in the same grip of fanatical megalomania as were the Japanese prior to the end of World War II and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It took the atomic bombs to literally produce some old school ‘shock and awe’ to smack the Japanese out of their militarist ways.

Iran is in fact, even more fanatical in that their political leadership is seized by Islamic fantasies about the ‘Mahdi’ climbing out of whatever well he’s been hiding in, to return (with Jesus alongside him no less) to wipe out ‘Allah’s enemies, destroy Israel, whatever bullshit it is they have embraced, and being that the entire country is Islamic, even the adherents of that death cult of a ‘religion’ are easily swayed by the more radical practitioners of those beliefs.

10 megatons on Tehran, 5 on Tabriz (the Assahollah Khomeini’s hometown) and 5 on Qom. THAT is the nuclear trifecta that will permanently remove those Persian pricks as any significant force on the world stage.

Unfortunately, 0bama would never take such action. In my opinion, he is secretly hoping Iran WILL drop a nuke on Israel, and considering how recent revelations (due to an open microphone with that joker Sarkozy) have proven that 0bama effectively despises Bibi Netanyahu, the only thing we will see as the mushroom cloud appears over Tel Aviv is a semi-solemn 0bama before the cameras, scripted by the TOTUS as always, ‘condemning’ the Iranian action and pledging to press for further ‘sanctions’ at the U.N. (’Useless Nations’).


18 posted on 11/09/2011 12:02:59 AM PST by mkjessup (I stand with Herman Cain, a God-fearing, Jesus-loving, Constitution-honoring PATRIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Hussein will only attack Iran for votes. It will be an election year move. He embraces those who hate Israel, so it’ll be a tough call for the regime.


23 posted on 11/09/2011 3:05:35 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

He would nuke Arizona before he would nuke Iran.


25 posted on 11/09/2011 3:29:37 AM PST by ImNotLying (Politicians and diapers should be changed often and for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
But in the end, as dangerous as an attack might be militarily and politically, if the President believes there is no other alternative to stopping Iran from gaining the ability to produce highly enriched uranium and thus manufacture nuclear weapons, he will seriously consider military action and it is hardly a certainty he won't take it. From a domestic political perspective, right now Obama's strong suit is his national security performance. For the first time in years, he has taken the issue away from the Republicans. Right now they simply cannot attack him as being weak or assert they understand defense better. That is why they are so silent on the issue.
Sure we can. We pursued an unauthorized, illegal war to overthrow Khaddafy, following the mistake of some of our NATO allies. We helped overthrow a bad regime, but one that was helping us fight Islamic terrorism and which had ended its active WMD programs. In fact some of the proponents of the war, had wanted to send Libya military aid last year. Instead of analyzing what was going on on the ground and who the players are, we followed the reckless policy of France and helped groups allied to Al Qaeda. Today, Al Qaeda's flag flies over parts of Libya. That is aiding an abetting the enemy time of war. Incompetence and a failure to lead but to rather follow the lunacy of some allies is no excuse. It is a reason to lose an election.

PS. What is with all of these pieces taht don't even contemplate the idea that Iran could be a threat to us with nukes?

29 posted on 11/09/2011 6:14:25 AM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
It would certainly make for a spectacular October Surprise.
33 posted on 11/09/2011 7:10:34 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.<sup>®</sup>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Obama nuking Iran when he has a ROE stating Americans cannot fart near a muslim, hahahahahahahahahahahaa, oh great satire!


34 posted on 11/09/2011 8:41:12 AM PST by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28, "...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson