Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dust in the Wind: Time for the EPA to Go!
Human Events ^ | 11/09/2011 | Newt Gingrich

Posted on 11/09/2011 9:13:54 AM PST by katiedidit1

The key to eliminating our oppressive regulatory regime is to simply replace the existing bureaucracy rather than trying to reform it. The current systems are so entrenched that we need to start over with new organizations and new people.

Overbearing bureaucrats are especially prominent at the Environmental Protection Agency. The arrogance, economic ignorance, and dictatorial attitude of the current organization are well known throughout much of America.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: epa

1 posted on 11/09/2011 9:14:00 AM PST by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

I nebver worry about laws too much, They can be changed, we can get new Representatives to wirte new ones, we can even go to court and beat them, but regulations are at the whim of some punk assed political appointee who decides all by his lonesome what the reg.s should be and the penal;ties.


2 posted on 11/09/2011 9:17:55 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

—Under “bureaucratic socialism,” you get to own your company, but federal bureaucrats tell you how to run it.—

Actually, that is called fascism.


3 posted on 11/09/2011 9:20:50 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Newt wants to reform and rename the EPA. One of the reasons why I say he may be the smartest R candidate, but woefully lacking the wisdom needed to be a good president.


4 posted on 11/09/2011 9:23:24 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I think if we had term limits on laws and regulations with a recorded vote required to continue the term, it would be a powerful force to control the bureaucracy AND the legislators...right now there are very few advocates for the repeal of of the compost supporting stinky government...


5 posted on 11/09/2011 9:29:07 AM PST by no-s (B.L.O.A.T. and every day...because some day soon they won't be making any more...for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Newt wants to reform and rename the EPA. One of the reasons why I say he may be the smartest R candidate, but woefully lacking the wisdom needed to be a good president.

Right. For all his great talk, his instincts are still with the State. A true conservative would advocate the outright elimination of the EPA, as an easy start.

I don't think Newt truly understands just how destructive the EPA is to our economy.

I think Newt still believes "with the right people" it can be made "better." He could not be more wrong.

6 posted on 11/09/2011 9:30:48 AM PST by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sand88

EPA and the Department of Energy; both should be shaken out like dusty throw rugs.


7 posted on 11/09/2011 9:39:25 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

And don’t forget the Department of Education which has ruined what was once the best education system in the world. Thank you Jimmy Carter!


8 posted on 11/09/2011 9:42:15 AM PST by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

IIRC, Nixon established the EPA by executive order, so in theory a future GOP POTUS could abolish it by EO as well.


9 posted on 11/09/2011 10:05:56 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Newt wants to abolish the epa as it is leftist run...his solution is right on target. Newt’s American Energy Plan:

1.Remove bureaucratic and legal obstacles to responsible oil and natural gas development in the United States, offshore and on land.
2.End the ban on oil shale development in the American West, where we have three times the amount of oil as Saudi Arabia.
3.Give coastal states federal royalty revenue sharing to give them an incentive to allow offshore development.
4.Reduce frivolous lawsuits that hold up energy production by enacting loser pays laws to force the losers in an environmental lawsuit to pay all legal costs for the other side.
5.Finance cleaner energy research and projects with new oil and gas royalties.
6.Replace the Environmental Protection Agency, which has become a job-killing regulatory engine of higher energy prices, with an Environmental Solutions Agency that would use incentives and work cooperatively with local government and industry to achieve better environmental outcomes while considering the impact of federal environmental policies on job creation and the cost of energy.


10 posted on 11/09/2011 10:07:49 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Newt speaking the truth on energy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnIkbLXif1g


11 posted on 11/09/2011 10:15:45 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
I am considering Newt, but have serious reservations at this time. However, Newt would be an easy pick over Mitt.

5.Finance cleaner energy research and projects with new oil and gas royalties.

This is more crony capitalism, pure and simple. Shame on you Newt. I say let the marketplace decide ALL our energy needs. Clean energy is nothing but a way for Marxists to impede capitalism.

6.Replace the Environmental Protection Agency, which has become a job-killing regulatory engine of higher energy prices, with an Environmental Solutions Agency that would use incentives and work cooperatively with local government and industry to achieve better environmental outcomes while considering the impact of federal environmental policies on job creation and the cost of energy.

The same bureacrats would just be reassigned. Again, the marketplace would be a superior steward of our environment. With the EPA gone, marketplace mechanisms would arise that would be more efficient, much less costly and able to respond more quickly to what would be real environmental concerns. The EPA used the "tragedy of the commons" to bring misery to every aspect of our lives.

Please ask Newt if he would get rid of the "Energy Star" program, requirement for low-flow toilets, etc. Ask him where in the United States Constitution does it permit the Federal government to such a thing.

I just heard a clip on Rush's program where Newt was still spouting off that AGW and hinting he is on the side of the left. He sounded as though he leans very much towards believing there is "definitely" a significant man-made component -- -- very disappointing.

With all that said, Newt would be superior to Mitt and he would utterly destroy Obama in the general.

12 posted on 11/09/2011 12:17:11 PM PST by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson