Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred

Cain doesn’t have much in the way of positions (he doesn’t know enough to have them, except in the most general of ways).

I don’t care what color Cain is, but as far as I can see, he’s the only one who has played the race card, complaining that he was being “targeted” because he was black. Do you seriously think the Dems wouldn’t have seized on a white GOP candidate with a verifiable paper trail like Cain’s?

He knew about this and he should have been ready for it, but instead he started out by lying (even though Politico had informed him almost 3 weeks earlier that they were going to run this story and had asked him for his comments) and then had to do the Clinton bit-by-bit acknowledgement.

And now, like Clinton, he’s going for the “best defense is a good offense.” He has never explained the details of the first, verified charges, his wife (with whom he was not living at the time, because she did not accompany him to DC) has not supported him, and he is revealing that, like Obama, he has no knowledge and only superficial ideas, and he thinks it’s all about him.


41 posted on 11/10/2011 4:56:03 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: livius
"verifiable paper trail like Cain’s?"

Show this verifiable paper trail...... You must know something that we don't - spill it! Oh right, you're listening to the libtards - nvm
48 posted on 11/10/2011 5:03:45 PM PST by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: livius
I don’t care what color Cain is, but as far as I can see, he’s the only one who has played the race card, complaining that he was being “targeted” because he was black.

I call bullshit on this. That's what I like about him, he doesn't pull the racecard and he could because he's fa>r blacker than Obama. You are SO out of arguments. GOP dies and the People win.

54 posted on 11/10/2011 5:09:04 PM PST by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: livius
He has never explained the details of the first, verified charges

What "verified" charges?

his wife (with whom he was not living at the time, because she did not accompany him to DC) has not supported him,

Do you have proof of your assertion that they were separated? Not that this would prove he harassed anyone, but I'm wondering where that statement comes from.

56 posted on 11/10/2011 5:13:56 PM PST by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: livius

Comparing Cain and this situation to Clinton is the stupidest thing I have ever seen posted congratulations you win the ROVE RINO MORON award.


80 posted on 11/10/2011 6:43:06 PM PST by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: livius

Cain ran companies, rescued companies, caused companies to thrive. Have you, keyboard punk? For you to say he has “no knowledge” and “superficial ideas” - let’s hear your resume, keyboard punk. Tell us how you are so much smarter and more capable than him. Take a break from repeating girl gossip and tell us your real world experience and how Cain is an idiot compared to you. I bet you can’t even lie about your own resume and have it stack up to his.


83 posted on 11/10/2011 6:50:27 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: livius

Your comments are so full of crap I almost can’t even stand to read them.

Do you have any clue what it means to be bound by an agreement of confidentiality? You tell me - you’re under an agreement of confidentiality and somebody in the media asks you about “allegations” but won’t tell you what allegations they are referring to; how do you respond? You can’t say anything about a particular case until it is specifically mentioned, but they won’t ever specifically mention anything so you’re free to address it. What do you do? The only reason for them to refuse to say what the specific charges were was so he would still be bound by the agreement and look like a doofus to people who are such dufuses that they don’t know what an agreement of silence means. Looks like the media snookered you, for instance.

I haven’t made any public announcements in support of my husband either. Would you say I “don’t support him”? This snide gossiping attitude stinks.

There are no verified charges. The allegations made were checked by the NRA and found to be without merit, so what “verified charges” are you talking about? If you’re talking about it being verified that charges were made, Cain acknowledged that, but the agreement of silence means that he cannot talk about the charges unless and until the specifics of those charges are already in the public sphere - and the NRA, the accuser, and the media all refused to make those details public.

And the “verification” that the media can do is all hearsay, since the NRA won’t release the documentation they have, so the question is whether the dems would have seized on a white GOP candidate with NO VERIFIABLE PAPER TRAIL like Cain’s; so tell me about the old, already-investigated-and-dismissed claims against white candidates.


104 posted on 11/10/2011 8:53:01 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson