Are you really that naive?
No.
Tell me that you evaluated the possibility that he was telling the truth. Tell me that if anyone was engaging in personal attacks on him BEFORE they evaluated what he had to say, they were acting basely.
Tell me that you are as interested in knowing the "flaws" in our candidates as vigorously as you would in Obama/Clinton/et al.
I am not anti-Cain. I am a Perry supporter, but I'm not anti-Cain.
That being said, when a private person brings up information that appears to be negative to one's candidate, the healthy first response should not be to attack the person before evaluating the quality/merit of the information.
Do you disagree?