Skip to comments.
Massachusetts passes bill making transgenderism/crossdressing a protected class
Life Site News ^
| November 18, 2011
| KathLEEN GILBERT
Posted on 11/18/2011 3:11:52 PM PST by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
1
posted on
11/18/2011 3:11:57 PM PST
by
NYer
To: wagglebee; little jeremiah
2
posted on
11/18/2011 3:12:29 PM PST
by
NYer
("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
To: NYer
Great...Weird is a protected class.
To: NYer
“Human” should be the only “protected” class. IMO
4
posted on
11/18/2011 3:15:08 PM PST
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: NYer
"Well I for one sure am relieved"
5
posted on
11/18/2011 3:15:22 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
('If you want to learn to love better, you should start with a friend who you hate ")
To: NYer
The birthplace of America, unbelievable
To: NYer
I guess if you refuse to have sex with one of these freaks you can be fined.
7
posted on
11/18/2011 3:17:06 PM PST
by
Dallas59
(President Robert Gibbs 2009-2011)
To: GeronL
Too logical for the illogical governing bodies.
8
posted on
11/18/2011 3:17:19 PM PST
by
VicVega
(Geaux LSU, Geaux Saints)
To: NYer
Become a freak and get a break.
9
posted on
11/18/2011 3:17:33 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: NYer
I can see the law suits now as sexual predators will have a field day in the girls rooms of Massachusetts. Wasn’t this one reason why this type of legislation fell flat in liberal NYC a few years ago?
To: NYer
The people who advocate such laws value social discord.
What better way to piss off the masses than to deny women privacy in public restrooms, by allowing men, under legal cover, to enter?
11
posted on
11/18/2011 3:21:20 PM PST
by
Tax Government
(Raise Cain over Obama. Herman Cain, that is...)
To: NewHampshireDuo
I will be using the ladies bathroom from now on while visiting Massachusetts!
12
posted on
11/18/2011 3:21:52 PM PST
by
thesaleboat
(Pray The Rosary Daily)
To: NYer
these people are full of beans
To: NYer
A provision stating that all sex-segregated facilities ... shall grant persons admission to and the full enjoyment of such facilities ... consistent with their gender identity or expression was removed from the measure at the last minute. It could have been a lot of laughs watching some girl who thinks she's a guy try to use a urinal.
To: NYer
So, as a guy, I could go to Massachusetts, put on a dress and walk into the Women’s Locker Room at Planet Fitness...or Hooters?
Uhmmm...
15
posted on
11/18/2011 3:24:18 PM PST
by
moovova
(Report my sarcastic, fear-mongering, hate-filled lies to www.AttackWatch.com by clicking HERE.)
To: thesaleboat
I am a woman, and I wear pants. There are some sects of my religion that feel women should only wear dresses/skirts, so according to their standards, I am cross-dressing. Now to move to Massachusetts.
16
posted on
11/18/2011 3:25:25 PM PST
by
ican'tbelieveit
(Washington,DC is FULL of people with Political Experience... How's that Working out for you??)
To: thesaleboat
17
posted on
11/18/2011 3:31:54 PM PST
by
palmer
(Before reading this post, please send me $2.50)
To: moovova
“So, as a guy, I could go to Massachusetts, put on a dress and walk into the Womens Locker Room at Planet Fitness...or Hooters?”
Why put on a dress. Couldn’t you just identify as a woman who is also a cross dresser?
To: NYer
So basically I could claim I’m a woman but I don’t want to wear a dress but I’ll go into and use the ladies room anyway.
These politicians are some of the sickest bastards I’ve ever seen to even consider something like this.
And we wonder why all kinds of abuse and molestation occurs in our society.
Stuff like this is nothing but a blatant attempt to destroy society.
Lets all celebrate mental illness and codify it in law.
19
posted on
11/18/2011 3:34:53 PM PST
by
headstamp 2
(Time to move forward not to the center.)
To: NYer
What is really needed is a sensible law which states that if a transgender or crossdressing person engages in sex with a non-transgender or non-crossdressing person without first informing them of their true status then they would be guilty of rape or the legal equivalent of rape.
In my mind, it is already morally and ethically rape.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson