[Marine_Uncle]

Of course your responses are valid. Many of us just keep repeating the underlining issues that have screwed this nation up so bad. I was just adding a few things that should be considered in the over all elective process.
Newt has his bad points. But taking in totality do they out weigh his strong points.
Huntsmen and Paul scare the hell out of me, from a foreign affairs and national security standpoint. Cain. Well I think the reality is he will need one heck of a lot of couching in most everything not job related.
The rest of the pack are in between both extremes. Mitt talks a good show. But on national security interests and how the military will be treated by the next administration. As usual they all get a sixty second time frame to wade into things that should take days on end with no breaks to expand on. In all due honesty I am not impressed by anyone that participates in these debates.

[sickoflibs]

RE :"Newt has his bad points. But taking in totality do they out weigh his strong points."

He has a lot of baggage.

First Bachmann, then Perry, then Cain, now (ugg) Newt. This is a recipe for Romney.