Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1

Your attacks are right out of the DNC playbook.

Cain NEVER said China didn’t have nukes. He has spoken of China’s military capabilities over the years, on his show and in his commentaries. Here is one from 2007:

“The U.S. should be less concerned about China’s economic potential than by the military threat it poses. Three Chinese spies were recently indicted in the U.S. for conspiring to steal numerous naval warship technologies. This summer China and Russia participated in a week-long joint military exercise. China’s build up of nuclear, military and space technologies to rival the U.S., and its saber-rattling over Taiwan’s independence, signals a commitment to more red, not green.”

http://economicfreedomcoalition.com/news/press-opinion-120305.asp

It never ceases to AMAZE me that you think lying helps your candidate.


347 posted on 11/29/2011 6:05:53 PM PST by justsaynomore (http://teamcain.hermancain.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: justsaynomore

Cain said China was close to getting nukes. I dont care if the man stays in or drops out...he will lose just like he lost the senate race in Georgia. He is toast.


363 posted on 11/29/2011 6:15:49 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

To: justsaynomore

HERMAN CAIN: I do view China as a potential military threat to the United States.

JUDY WOODRUFF: And what could you do as president to head that off?

HERMAN CAIN: My China strategy is quite simply outgrow China. It gets back to economics. China has a $6 trillion economy and they’re growing at approximately 10 percent. We have a $14 trillion economy — much bigger — but we’re growing at an anemic 1.5, 1.6 percent. When we get our economy growing back at the rate of 5 or 6 percent that it has the ability to do, we will outgrow China.

And secondly, we already have superiority in terms of our military capability, and I plan to get away from making cutting our defense a priority and make investing in our military capability a priority, going back to my statement: peace through strength and clarity. So yes they’re a military threat. They’ve indicated that they’re trying to develop nuclear capability and they want to develop more aircraft carriers like we have. So yes, we have to consider them a military threat.

What part of “They’ve indicated that they’re TRYING to develop nuclear capability” dont you understand?


367 posted on 11/29/2011 6:20:05 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson