Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I suspect that this sort of thing is a "test". A similar "questionnaire" was put to the Marine Corps several years ago during the Clinton regime. There was a bit of a ruckus about it, and many of the Marines later privately admitted that they just lied about it, since they were pretty sure that answering in the negative would have probably cost them future promotions and choice assignments, if not their military careers.

If this story is true, then these troops who might (?) also be Marines have taken a much more proactive response to it, and are calling the regime's bluff. That takes courage.

It will be interesting to determine (if we can) whether this is an accurate account, and if so what the consequences to these young Patriots will eventually be. Obviously the courageous "Point man" is being made an example of, as is a common military practice. Another common military practice is to punish an entire Unit for the misdeeds or infractions of one or a few. If true, this probably isn't over.

As many of my regular correspondents and E-mail "Intel Loop" members know, I have been speculating for some time now about how an unconstitutional Muslim Stalinist usurper President may well emulate his Idol's historic tactics to assure the "loyalty" of the Soviet military back in the 1930s.

It was called the "Great Purge", and it wasn't pretty.

So I'm an alarmist and conspiracy theorist... OK; ...but I will be greatly blessed and relieved (again, assuming veracity of this story) if those brave, patriotic American Warriors are still "among us" being seen and heard from a year from now.

1 posted on 12/08/2011 2:41:52 PM PST by George Varnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: George Varnum

Okay, so what happened at Kent State?


2 posted on 12/08/2011 2:50:18 PM PST by SkyDancer ("If You Want To Learn To Love Better, You Should Start With A Friend Who You Hate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

Post # 57 at the link say the General in charge of the CA Nat’l Guard insists this never happened.

What would you expect him to say?

This requires more investigation and sunshine.


3 posted on 12/08/2011 2:52:02 PM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

The oath is to “...protect and defend the constitution...”, not “congress, the president, or inside the beltway”.

It appears our young military folks are far better acquainted with the constitution than are the low lifes in D.C.

Beware, politicians...you have not corrupted all of our folks ...yet.

As for Kent State, those folks should not have been there...and they obviously were not well briefed. Try looking at LBJ, a master felon if there ever was one.


5 posted on 12/08/2011 2:54:34 PM PST by Da Coyote (Liberalism - when you absolutely, positively have no ability to produce wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

When I served in the US Navy, we were taught that it was our obligation and duty to refuse to obey an illegal order.

The responsibility for this should be laid where it deserves: directly on the US Congress.

The problem as I see it: Obama is bringing in hundreds of thousands of Muslims as refugees. We have a southern border that actually no longer exists and millions of people who hate the USA are flooding into our nation. Our DOJ will not protect the civil rights of whites, Christians or Jews.

We are being set up.


8 posted on 12/08/2011 2:58:31 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

This is actually an interesting question that I have been expecting to see come up. A lot of speculation has been aimed at what the National Guard or the military would do if, for example, Americans were to revolt against their government.

While the “sample size” is pretty small, it does provide some insight into the way that the military feels toward American civilians.

One respondent to this post asked about Kent State. Kent State occurred in a totally different environment and a very different set of circumstances. The Vietnam War had been so propagandized and denigrated by the media, John Kerry, Jane Fonda and Walter Cronkite as an “unpopular war” that all of the military men and women of the day were equally denigrated by the American public. It didn’t matter if a serviceman or woman had actually served in Vietnam, if they wore a uniform, they were guilty.

Today’s military enjoy the benefit of being wildly supported by the public, even though the media still despise them. As a result, the environment is different. In addition, they DO have the perspective of time to look back at what happened at Kent State and learn from it. I honestly doubt that many National Guard or active duty military would be willing to open fire on American citizens today. Too many things have changed and are different.


11 posted on 12/08/2011 3:05:17 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

Sorry, but this isn’t remotely believable.


15 posted on 12/08/2011 3:16:05 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

This story doesn’t pass muster. Smells just like a fishy rumor to me. BS.


19 posted on 12/08/2011 3:27:44 PM PST by tupac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum
The only people left in front of the original formation was 3 Capt’s. 2 Lt’s and the BN Commander who was so upset he started having chest pains from yelling and screaming about court martials and disbandment of the unit into other units.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

If this is true, I am deeply saddened by the behavior of the officers. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME! on them!

These officers took and oath before God to uphold the Constitution. They LIED! They lied to the American people. They lied to God! They bore false witness. They took the Lord's name in vain.

Taking the Lord's name in vain has far far far **MORE** deeper implications that merely saying, “G__ D___!” It means swearing an oath and LYING while doing it! These officers evidently had absolutely NO NO NO intention of upholding the Constitution when they swore before God to do so.

Exodus 20:7 “You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.”

By the way...I am DISGUSTED with our very highest military. When did ignoring Obama’s forgeries, identity theft, multiple social security numbers, failure to e-verify, election fraud, and other crimes become part of the military code of honor? How did this become part of defending the Constitution? Is **this** how they watch the backs of the brave and honorable troops serving under them. ( Pass the barf bucket, please!)

20 posted on 12/08/2011 3:32:04 PM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

It was irresponsible for Oath Keepers and anyone else to report this without confirmation.

People can only form an opinion with all the information. There are too many that get riled up, only to find the story untrue. If this proves to be true, then I will be as upset as anyone else, and join action against this purported tyranny.

US Army, Sgt, 1976-1984


21 posted on 12/08/2011 3:33:13 PM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

This sort of question always came up from time-to-time over the years in several different units I was in, usually preceeded by many adult beverages.

General consensus was that nothing was bad enough to get us to the point of shooting American citizens but such an event would cause working the way up the chain of command to find from where such an order originated.


30 posted on 12/08/2011 3:51:45 PM PST by VeniVidiVici ("Si, se gimme!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

There are no Marines in the National Guard. Only Army and Airforce.


33 posted on 12/08/2011 3:55:47 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum
“So I'm an alarmist and conspiracy theorist” among other character defects. lol
38 posted on 12/08/2011 4:09:18 PM PST by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

I call BS on this story.

Whatever your politics, you break ranks in a battalion formation and lay your weapon on the ground, you are going to be doing rifle PT until the Sarn Maj, First Shirt, and ALL the Plat Daddies get tired.

And there is no way everyone thought this was was a good idea.


43 posted on 12/08/2011 4:20:06 PM PST by Molon Labbie (Occupiers- The world is watching....and alternatively laughing and vomiting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

My wife’s brother, who lives in Germany, read in some newspaper from one of those eastern European countries that this story was confirmed by a Russian tree trimmer who overheard the house owner on a phone call to his cousin’s neighbor in Latvia who swears she knows someone who was in touch with a friend in California who witnessed the whole thing. It must be true.


45 posted on 12/08/2011 4:32:38 PM PST by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum; Two Thirds Vote Aye

2/3rds, pinging for your consideration.

This unit will be in my prayers.


52 posted on 12/08/2011 5:20:30 PM PST by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum
This one?.


73 posted on 12/08/2011 7:16:05 PM PST by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; one box left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum
One of the questions was, will you as a member of the Nat. Guard use lethal force against the American public if ordered to do so?

With the current climate of most NG troops, I can add this bit. At a TEA party event, probably only a few would. At an OWS camp, most would ask for additional 30 found magazines.

74 posted on 12/08/2011 7:46:03 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum
One of the questions was, will you as a member of the Nat. Guard use lethal force against the American public if ordered to do so?

As a current senior enlisted member of the TXARNG, I'll add this tidbit. At a TEA party event with the US flags on display, most would not carry out the order. At any OWS camp, most would ask for additional 30 round magazines.

75 posted on 12/08/2011 7:50:15 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: George Varnum

One has to be careful how one words the question. The Guard is authorized to shoot looters, rioters, insurrectionists, ect.

But just so long as they understand that anyone who shoots at me is going to get shot back at.


78 posted on 12/08/2011 7:53:38 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Old Sarge

You may want to weigh in on this one too.


81 posted on 12/08/2011 8:09:06 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson