Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Newt can not be Rino because he is the definition of being Republican

Newt can not be tagged with the revised and totally depraved definition so many here have allowed to creep into the term of RINO.


15 posted on 12/09/2011 1:49:58 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: bert

I just plain don’t like Newt Gingrich...never have, never will. After McCain, I vowed I would never again vote for a RINO. Nor would I vote for a man who has character issues like infidelity and adultery. Sorry abut that.

The only two candidates I can support as true Christian conservatives are Santorum and Bachmann.

They don’t just talk the talk—they walk the walk. And have been doing so all their lives.


30 posted on 12/09/2011 1:59:55 PM PST by Palladin (Santorum/Bachmann 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: bert
Newt can not be Rino because he is the definition of being Republican

I think you have just swerved into the problem.

37 posted on 12/09/2011 2:03:48 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Holding our flawed politicians to higher standards than the enemyÂ’s politicians guarantees they win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson