Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillGunn

Yep. The SC has already set the precedent in Gonzales v. Raich that ANYTHING affects interstate commerce, even home-cultivation of a plant the trade in which is actually illegal between States. So a federal health insurance mandatte? That’s a slam dunk.


8 posted on 12/14/2011 3:57:31 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfie
Yep. The SC has already set the precedent in Gonzales v. Raich that ANYTHING affects interstate commerce, even home-cultivation of a plant the trade in which is actually illegal between States. So a federal health insurance mandatte? That’s a slam dunk.

The precedent was Wickard v Filburn. And it was an absolute piece of crap.

14 posted on 12/14/2011 4:09:42 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson