Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich of Freddie Mac
Wall St. J ^ | December 17, 2011

Posted on 12/17/2011 8:44:22 PM PST by Steelfish

DECEMBER 17, 2011 Gingrich of Freddie Mac The Speaker's defense is hurting him as much as his $1.6 million payday.

Newt Gingrich's opponents aren't letting up in their criticism of his lucrative ties to the failed mortgage giant Freddie Mac after he resigned as House Speaker in the late 1990s. More damaging to his Presidential candidacy is that Mr. Gingrich doesn't seem to understand why anyone is offended.

In his first response after news broke that he'd made $300,000 working for Freddie, Mr. Gingrich claimed he had "offered them advice on precisely what they didn't do." As a "historian," he said during a November 9 debate, he had concluded last decade that "this is a bubble," and that Freddie and its sister Fannie Mae should stop making loans to people who have no credit history. He added that now they should be broken up.

A week later Bloomberg reported that Mr. Gingrich had made between $1.6 million and $1.8 million in two separate contracts with Freddie between 1999 and 2008. The former Speaker stuck to his line that "I was approached to offer strategic advice" and had warned the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) to stop lending to bad credit risks.

Then on December 2 our colleagues at the Journal reported that as late as April 2007 Mr. Gingrich had defended Fannie and Freddie as examples of conservative governance. "While we need to improve the regulation of the GSEs, I would be very cautious about fundamentally changing their role or the model itself," Mr. Gingrich said in an interview at the time.

Mr. Gingrich added in that interview that there are times "when you need government to help spur private enterprise and economic development."

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fannie; freddie; gingrich; newt; rinoexcuses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: Steelfish
The WSJ is owned by Murdoch as is Fox News. Is it any wonder that they are attacking Newt and in the tank for Willard? And dumbass Republicans across the nation are doing the same thing they did in 2008: backing down and accepting the media's candidate.

Willard will lose and we get Fo' Mo' Years of Marxism.

61 posted on 12/18/2011 4:47:50 AM PST by Dr. Thorne (Fall on your knees before Christ, your only salvation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The kind of brutal scrutiny the GOP candidates have been subjected to is UNHEARD OF in American History.

The fact is NOBODY is perfect. And Gingrich and ALL OF THEM, despite any of their flaws - and as human beings we all have them - are FAR BETTER than the Marxist Muslim in the White House. If we are not going to support a candidate unless they are PERFECT in every way, we will never find such a candidate anywhere on earth.

We have to STOP micro scrutinizing these candidates and start ZEROING IN on Obama. NOW. Before the Mainstream Media TOTALLY discredit each and every GOP candidate in the public eye long before they ever battle that Marxist Muslim Bastard for the Presidency.


62 posted on 12/18/2011 5:11:32 AM PST by ZULU (Anybody but Romney or Huntsman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Keep on talking about Newt and Fannie Mae while all the democrat corruption and cover up by Frank and Dodd and the Black in the house etc etc is muted


63 posted on 12/18/2011 5:29:20 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Well said and illustrated!


64 posted on 12/18/2011 5:33:51 AM PST by BilLies (Bumper Sticker: RON PAUL WOULD BE WORSE THAN OBAMA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Newt Gingrich had a consulting contract with Freddie Mac. Why are some Republicans upset about someone working for themselves, and making money at it?

It's called "guilt by association", and it's one of the lowest and laziest logical fallacies. Since FM was in the sup-prime mortgage business, and Newt did work for them, then Newt is guilty of FM's indiscretions. Even though many admit right on this thread that they have NO IDEA what he was actually paid for. It's the kind of tenuous tie that a, say, Michele Bachman might use to say Newt was "for partial-birth abortion."

65 posted on 12/18/2011 5:45:49 AM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Palin was a money grubbing opportunist...

More commonly referred to as a capitalist.

66 posted on 12/18/2011 5:51:23 AM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

Roads, post office, central banks, Louisiana Purchase .... all promoted during the first 30 years after the Constitution. And if you think the United States Military is just there to protect you from being enslaved and but secure your entitlement to private property and gain, you are do not know your history.
Any organization can be corrupted, even Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac when it is turned into a vehicle for redistribution of wealth, read Red Lining.


67 posted on 12/18/2011 5:51:53 AM PST by BilLies (Bumper Sticker: RON PAUL WOULD BE WORSE THAN OBAMA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BilLies

The problem is not with Freddie Mac, who in it’s pure from could be a benefit to our society, but in the corrupt leftists that used it to line their pockets. and to stay in office, much as they are fixing to do with all those yummy health-care dollars.


68 posted on 12/18/2011 5:56:33 AM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ez

And don’t forget the biggest boondoggle of them all.....Global Warming....guaranteed loans to contributors, state, local, utility and Federal tax deductions/credits for financially inefficient energy makeovers; and the real intent is the spreading the government tentacles into the your freedoms while making the Progressive/Liberals more powerful and rich.


69 posted on 12/18/2011 6:21:57 AM PST by BilLies (Bumper Sticker: RON PAUL WOULD BE WORSE THAN OBAMA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
However, I am not willing to swallow a crock of Newt’s self-serving ‘me-say’on his word alone. You can’t trust his word.

Then Romney is your boy. You can trust everything he says.

70 posted on 12/18/2011 7:40:03 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I guess this is your way of deflecting criticism on your candidate. I told you Romney isn’t one I’d vote for. Your stubbornness doesn’t equate to capitulation for Romney on my part. Defend your pick instead of crazy accusations.


71 posted on 12/18/2011 7:52:45 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer; xzins; Jim Robinson
Defend your pick instead of crazy accusations.

the accusation that Gingrich did anything wrong while working for Freddie Mac is crazy.

Not one person has come forward with any claim that what he did was either illegal or unethical. The accusation is simply that he worked for the company before it went belly up. Guilt by association. Typical liberal tactic.

Now defend YOUR guy. (Whoever the hell it is).

72 posted on 12/18/2011 8:11:46 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

If you reread my post you will see that I did not claim such. I said I only wanted to see documentation of what his ‘consultation’ entailed - which you take as a slam and automatic vote for the puke Romeny.

You are as full of as much BS as Newt is, who I know of very very well as my former Congressman. You really are not worth arguing with if this is all you’ve got.


73 posted on 12/18/2011 8:15:19 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CIDKauf

Newton says Newton is a progressive in the model of Hamilton and Teddy Roosevelt.


74 posted on 12/18/2011 8:44:40 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Newt says he wants to improve Freddie Mac and help people buy homes who otherwise wouldn’t qualify.


75 posted on 12/18/2011 8:45:59 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: duckln

It depends on how many times and to what extent. Newt likes to count those time with the second hand of his watch from Tiffany’s.


76 posted on 12/18/2011 8:51:32 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Our founders set up a government that would be as national and as powerful as England’s parliament when the House, States and the president, elected by the electoral college agreed but only then. When there is disagreement between the three, government is supposed to be as insignificant as Jefferson wanted.

The problem today is that the power continues on and on when there is no agreement. Newt likes that power. He encourages it. He wants to make it bigger and more effective.


77 posted on 12/18/2011 8:55:28 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

ARPA-net, like velcro, was not created for the public. It was created to maintain communications between the military in case our communications were attacked. It had an incidental civilian application which has proven to be very valuable.

Newt doesn’t speak of things like ARPA-net. Newt speaks of things like Solyndra.


78 posted on 12/18/2011 9:03:51 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

What advice did Freddie Mac get that Freddie Mac thought was worth $1.6million? Do you really think Newt proposed to tell them how damaging their existence was and they said, “We’ll take $1.6million of that!”


79 posted on 12/18/2011 9:05:37 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Ha! Good point.


80 posted on 12/18/2011 9:07:30 AM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson