Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia Attorney General Intervenes in GOP Primary Ballot Dispute
foxnews.com ^ | 12/31/2011 | Carl Cameron

Posted on 12/31/2011 9:43:16 AM PST by TBBT

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is intervening in the Virginia presidential primary dispute and plans to file emergency legislation to address the inability of most Republican presidential candidates to get their name on the ballot, Fox News has learned. Only Mitt Romney and Ron Paul qualified for the Virginia primary, a contest with 49 delegates up for grabs. The failure of other candidates to qualify -- notably Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry -- led to complaints that the 10,000-signature requirement is too stringent. Cuccinelli, who is a Republican, shared the concerns. "Recent events have underscored that our system is deficient," he said in a statement. "Virginia owes her citizens a better process. We can do it in time for the March primary if we resolve to do so quickly." Cuccinelli's proposal is expected to state that if the Virginia Board of Elections certifies that a candidate is receiving federal matching funds, or has qualified to receive them, that candidate will upon request be automatically added to the ballot. Two former Democratic attorneys general are also backing the move, along with a former Democratic state party chairman and a former Republican state party chairman. Former state Attorney General Tony Troy called the Virginia process a "legal and constitutional embarrassment."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: ballot; cuccinelli; elections; gingrich; gopprimary; mafia; officiouscriminals; perry; publiccorruption; publicfags; va2012; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: org.whodat

You seem to have no problem posting links to far lefty websites.

Begone Troll!


101 posted on 12/31/2011 2:23:19 PM PST by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

I need new reading glasses. Thought you asked about Gooch’s proposal, that being an OLD VA name.

Let’s not write off Bolling as irrelevant. Only days before the RPV verification, he won a suit filed by Dems about his being the tie-breaking vote in the evenly divided State Senate. So he will remain a key figure in VA politics for the next few years.

In the last general election for Gov/Lt Gov/AG, IIRC, Cuccinelli got the highest vote of the 3, tho all did well. Cuccinelli also managed to survive a virtual sweep by Dems of Northern VA some years back. He will get more attention (or notoriety) in March when he argues the VA case against Obamacare at the Supreme Court. So, he is well positioned to win the GOP nomination for governor in ‘13. But it won’t be pretty.

Before Cuccinelli’s announcement about this route to a resolution, the Gov said he would be interested in viable alternatives; the state party chair said he would work with the legislature to change the law, so I would imagine he’d be on board. I’m not sure how ANY wing of the GOP in VA stands to gain by not changing the statute.


102 posted on 12/31/2011 2:24:36 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
No, noot said 1600 of his names were fraud. And in the past if you got 15,000 or more they thought that a 5000 margin was enough to make up for people improperly listed.
103 posted on 12/31/2011 2:26:26 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

To: JediJones
Yes Liberals and some RINO's and we can pretty well guess who those two are.

They want to cry, moan and carry on in this thread, like they have been suddenly neutered by this new statue of the Gov. of Va., (well I suppose they have/will be neutered, LOL).

When at some point their man/woman is subjected to such as not being on a ballot, think they will be crying/moaning to us?? Yet, it will be us who will stand up for their rights to be on a ballot, but we will then have the right to CRAM their moaning and groaning down their throats.

Sour grapes and CROW I understand don't taste very well.

105 posted on 12/31/2011 2:28:47 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

Far left is on the left coast, but I have no idea what you are taking about, if what was in the article was factually wrong correct it.


106 posted on 12/31/2011 2:30:05 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative
"""We’re taking back the White House. Period"""

YOU PREACH IT. GO NEWT.

107 posted on 12/31/2011 2:31:53 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: TBBT

Virginia’s governor doesn’t want Newt in the race. Newt was leading in the polls by 5% so I would bet Rove and others were also involved (behind the scenes) with ways to eliminate Gingrich and even Perry.
Also, on Weds., the republican party of Va came up with a new “oath” where voters have to promise to support the republican nominee. Now, I did hear Newt’s name come up on Fox and naturally they mentioned that Newt stated publicly that he would NOT vote for Paul IF Paul was the nominee. Since Gingrich is a Va voter...he will have to back track on his words in order to vote. Everything is a type of petty fix to make the man look bad. I am fed up and disgusted with the Romney lovers trying to pull every dirty trick in the book and than some...

“Virginia’s onerous and restrictive ballot access rules do create serious constitutional problems and undermine the rights of citizens and candidates,” the campaign said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/31/virginia-attorney-general-intervenes-in-gop-primary-ballot-dispute/#ixzz1i9Ze7Wa1


109 posted on 12/31/2011 2:35:36 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Good for Cuccinelli.

Obama won Virginia, and I would think GOP would pull out all the stops to enable Republican candidates to appear on the ballot as well as encouraging GOP voter turnout.


110 posted on 12/31/2011 2:35:36 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Newt says amnesty isn't amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Romney has been a done deal for months.

Ignore the charade.


111 posted on 12/31/2011 2:36:57 PM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Additionally, the Virginia GOP and other state GOPs need to challenge Ron Paul’s claim to be a Republican, when he is Libertarian. He should not be able to run as Republican.


112 posted on 12/31/2011 2:40:03 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Newt says amnesty isn't amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

No, it’s state law:
Ҥ 24.2-545. Presidential primary...
B. Any person seeking the nomination of the national political party for the office of President of the United States, or any group organized in this Commonwealth on behalf of, and with the consent of such person, may file with the State Board petitions signed by at least 10,000 qualified voters, including at least 400 qualified voters from each congressional district in the Commonwealth...”

The confusion about this has arisen because it’s the Party that counts and certifies the vote and in October the R Party told the candidates it would verify all their signatures unless they had at least 15,000.
It’s the duty of the Party to attest that the candidate has gotten the 10,000 signatures from qualified voters as the law requires.
Of course the Party could just lie to the state.

But I don’t want to think Perry or Gingrich were counting on the Party evading the law.
I think they just didn’t appreciate the task before them.


113 posted on 12/31/2011 2:42:21 PM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: sillipuddi
Yeah, I can't say that that looks good for McDonnell.

I just got off the phone with a friend who went home to the Tidewater over Christmas. She says everyone she spoke to is angry that Mitt and Ron are the only two on the ballot. I think they are leaning Perry.

I can give you a report from the Valley in a few days once my mother gets settled back in. She was away from the Commonwealth when this ballot decision was made.

114 posted on 12/31/2011 2:51:19 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Cuccinelli was one of the moderators on Huckabee’s Fox debate last month. I guess he’d feel pretty stupid if he moderated a debate and most of the candidates didn’t even make it on his state’s ballot.

http://www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2011/12/video-watch-the-entire-huckabee-gop-presidential-forum/


115 posted on 12/31/2011 2:58:14 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

Here is another story from another, what you must term, a left wing web site, http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/President/2011/1231/Newt-Gingrich-s-rise-and-fall-tied-to-his-reign-as-House-Speaker


116 posted on 12/31/2011 3:01:05 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and nervous supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Begone troll!


117 posted on 12/31/2011 3:08:46 PM PST by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Romney has been a done deal for months.
------------------

Repo Men (Wall St. bankers and D.C. ruling class, "more than a few of them belong in prison.")

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2826109/posts?page=49

RepoMen have switched to Mittens.

118 posted on 12/31/2011 3:08:55 PM PST by txhurl (Perry/Pence 2012 OR Perry/Ryan 2012 or even better Perry/Abbott 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: sillipuddi

’ “I think [the] ???? former governor ought to be the next president of the United states,” said McDonnell ‘

I think this is a misquote or possibly a ‘mis-speak’.

I know he has said: ‘“I think [A] former governor ought to be the next president of the United states,”’
several times.

He shmoozes Perry too:
“...Perry was introduced at the luncheon by Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, who noted that he had not yet endorsed in the presidential race said earlier in the campaign that he preferred the GOP nominate a governor. McDonnell heaped praise on Perry and recalled their good-natured jousting over job creation in their states.”

And Newt:
“Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell spoke before Gingrich. While he praised Gingrich’s “profound understanding of history,” he did not endorse the candidate.
In a separate interview this week, McDonnell said he is “still considering” whether he’ll endorse any of the Republican candidates.
“The best candidate is one who sticks to their conservative principles but shows the best ability to message that conservative message to win the independent voter. That’s the whole battle in this election, is winning the independent voter,” McDonnell said. “

I’d say he likes Romney, Perry ,Newt in that order- but would be comfortable with any.


119 posted on 12/31/2011 3:14:23 PM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I’m not crazy about the State intervening in Party matters. The GOP should make amends because they’ve acted stupidly, but for an elected official to use the weight of his office to change the decision of a private matter is not a good precedent.


120 posted on 12/31/2011 3:20:08 PM PST by elvis-lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson