Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New poll (Public Policy Polling): Paul, Romney and Santorum tied in Iowa
Yahoo ^ | 1/2/12 | Chris Moody - The Ticket

Posted on 01/02/2012 2:23:33 PM PST by NormsRevenge

SIOUX CENTER, Iowa--Here's where we stand in the final day before the caucuses. According to the latest survey from Public Policy Polling, it looks like a statistical dead heat between Mitt Romney, Ron Paul and Rick Santorum for the top slot in the state.

With a margin of error of plus or minus 2.7 percentage points, Romney leads with 19 percent, followed by Paul with 18 percent and Santorum with 17 percent...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Massachusetts; US: Minnesota; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: iowa; massachusetts; michelebachmann; minnesota; mittromney; newt; pennsylvania; poll; ricksantorum; romney; ronpaul; santorum; southcarolina; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: NormsRevenge

Let us remember the Public Policy Polling is a RAT outfit.

They desperately want Myth to win so nobama has an automatic reelect.


21 posted on 01/02/2012 5:07:44 PM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

The endgame is Santorum splitting votes so Romney can win just like Fred Thompson did four years ago for McCain.

The splitting of the vote for Romney is in full swing.

Its sad to see conservatives so divided into Perry, Santorum etc.

If Paul wins tomorrow, he and Romney would be at war with each other and the media would bear down on Paul into New Hampshire.

This would allow a conservative regrouping in SC for a win.
Newt would be able to work that state for a possible win.

If Santorum wins, he carries momentum into SC but gets the media anal exam to knock his numbers down. Newt, Perry and Santorum split the vote to allow a Romney win.

Its sad that too many took the Perry bait back in August when conservatives were uniting behind Bachmann and beating Romney.

We’ve gone through a four month show that’s split our votes so Romney can win.


22 posted on 01/02/2012 5:08:36 PM PST by Nextrush (President Sarah Palin sounds just right to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
They desperately want Myth to win so nobama has an automatic reelect.

That's the scary thing. They are doing a good job of fooling a lot of the public that Romney has a shot at winning the Republican primary.
23 posted on 01/02/2012 5:55:43 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

“Newt would be able to work that state for a possible win.”

Replace Newt with Santorum and I agree wholeheartedly. We’ve got our man now, Santorum, and the conservatives need to get behind him to deny Iowa to Romney and Paul.


24 posted on 01/02/2012 6:30:11 PM PST by BenKenobi (Sky friend abase committal meets for Chemo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If accurate (and I have doubts about PPP), this points to a Santorum win.

If true, it’s sad that a guy would win because he has had no negative attacks. Tells us something disappointing about the electorate.

Yes, of course I will support Santorum in the general. I just hope he can handle the crap.


25 posted on 01/03/2012 7:16:22 AM PST by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
"The big surprise Tuesday night will be that Paul doesn’t break 10%."

I hear you,though I'm guessing he'll pull 12%, with half of those from nuisance false-flag Democrats.

In the Colorado Caucus (one of the other few caucus states-->Feb 7), you have to be registered GOP 60 days before the caucus.

26 posted on 01/03/2012 7:20:58 AM PST by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
Idiot college students. Iowa has a lot of them.

Iowa figured out by making their colleges very affordable, they could hang on to their young people for a few more years.

And it isn't just the locals. There are reciprocity agreements between Iowa and most of states in the region, so you get a lot of out of staters going to the caucuses in Iowa.

27 posted on 01/03/2012 7:29:06 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Its sad to see conservatives so divided into Perry, Santorum etc.

I put a little of that on the backs of Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin. Neither one of them have the balls to support one particular candidate. Way too cautious for my taste. If these guys are as fiesty and gutsy as they pretend to be on the air, grow some balls and tell us who you like. Get off the dam fence.

28 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:28 AM PST by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]




Donate Just One Monthly
And Become a FR Hero



29 posted on 01/03/2012 8:48:07 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: South40; All

“The pro-marijuana lobby is more powerful than you think.”

Hence the vote of Potheads is helping Paul. As are naive youths and people that can’t read or write but we allow to vote anyway. Sorry....I don’t like Paul or 99% of his supporters. So, I’m a little snarky.


30 posted on 01/03/2012 5:23:19 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Sorry....I don’t like Paul or 99% of his supporters. So, I’m a little snarky.

No need for apologies, my FRiend.

They are snarky. They act as though we don't know why we oppose their lunatic candidate or that we have no reason not to. That he comes across as certifiably insane is reason enough. Add his foreign policy ideas to the mix and he is 100% unelectable.

I don't oppose the idea of medical marijuana. I'm just not ready to elect Pat Paulson president to acquire it.

31 posted on 01/03/2012 6:51:11 PM PST by South40 (Just say NO to pro-ILLEGAL alien RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson