Skip to comments.Why Is Newt So Angry?? [must see - JimRob]
Posted on 01/05/2012 12:16:50 PM PST by musicman
IMHO, A MUST SEE 15 minute video describing why Newt is "so angry" !!!
Newt is hawking a book, if he can’t hold the lead then bluster will give him more press.
He does have Tiffany’s bills to pay you know!
I think you misspelled your screen name. It's missing the "r".
I don’t believe Newt will do ANY of what he says. Not one bit. I don’t see much of a list of accomplishments in his career. Lots of big talk, almost no follow through. Then of course there’s the enviro waffling, how can I believe that a guy that appeared in an Al Gore ad doesn’t believe in global warming and will dismantle the EPA?
I don’t see a 90% solution with Newt, I see another zero. Because I look at what he DOES which is so often at odds with what he SAYS. If he did what he said I’d love him, but his history is doing the opposite of what he said.
Thanks for that.I hate it when “they” get to pick “our” candidates!
Yes weather and fishing have been exceptional!
The sailfish moved in in November slowed down and just picked up this week with some boats getting 8-10 fish per day.
Other than that the bottom bite is great, Spanish mackerel in the back,all the rest moving in to town as we speak.
This isn’t about Newt. It’s about the country. Unfortunately, it isn’t about Romney either.
These polls are huge!!Why isn’t Newt promoting them? I hate it when we have to hand hold all these people that should know what they are doing!! Our job is simply endless since the ones that should be doing things for themselves don’t for some reason!! I have not figured it out yet.
He's also not a Jesus praising Evangelical or Catholic and the lamestream likes that, too.
Romney won't go after obama’s Jeremiah Wright and Black Liberation Theology beliefs.
Look, I don't like Gingrich and I don't think he's the best choice, period, because I've had a long experience with him being his constituent.
That said, if he's what's left coming up against Romney, then I'll support him. But I am not about to relent at this point and ‘coalesce around a conservative alternative' to Romney when the underlying imperative of that argument is Gingrich, solely (a concerted effort here at FR).
I'll take Santorum or Perry any day of the week over Gingrich. And, if either of them is on the ballot in Georgia come March, I'll make a choice between the two over Newt.
Thanks Luv...I watched it on the Rush thread, posted there too, it needs to get seen by all and out there.
Romney, oBama and Paul have their people just everywhere taking up space...we need to fill it in! All three of them will guarantee a win for Obama if we don’t.
I remember well Newt saying he wanted us “with” him and that no man can do the job ahead alone....and He’s right.
Go Newt Go!
Sending the video link to my e-mail list.
I still can’t believe it onyx but Romney looks like the worst candidate we have! Why don’t the others see it as well?
can’t change and obama supporters mind....
You’ve captured Newty perfectly. As his cheerleaders keep telling us Newt is so smart he can take any side of an issue. That’s cool. But what does he believe?
Newtybots like to hark back to his Speaker and before days and tell us he did this balanced budget thing or that tax thing. All this was good in a small way. The point is Newty never addressed, let alone attack, the real problems:
1. Marxist usurption of American judiciary.
2. Marxist usurption of education.
3. Marxist usurption of unions.
4. Marxist usurption of media.
5. Marxist usurption of religious leadership.
6. Marxist usurption of Wall Street leadership.
These are the real problems. The rest are symptoms. Addressing them is simply nibbling at the edges.
Really? And that explains his knee to knee love seat global warming ad with Pelosi?
And that magically erases Pelosi’s very public statement about having the goods on Newty? Pelosi owns Newty. If you don’t understand that you understand nothing.
Unions are commie from the get-go.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he was bi polar. His behavior is too erratic.
In 40 years I have never heard Newt Gingrich do anything erratic. Self promotion, yeah. Politician, yeah, but not erratic. He is not bi-polar. He is a man who knows so much it’s difficult for him to condense it into sound bites. He wants to explain things in detail and most people are too shallow to understand. Most only understand poster sound bites (that’s why twitter was invented). To say that Newt has never done anything significant is just plain wrong. I remember what it was like to see the man capture Congress for the first time in 40 years. He is more responsible for conservatism to begin to get a foot in the door in Washington than any other person. Falwell raised consciousness, but Newt implemented the ideas. When his dalliance was disclosed he was gentleman enough to step down. He has had some rough times in his life, so I give him a pass on the personal stuff. That is between him and God anyway. Newt will make a fine president.
We need to spread this video around to show the country that Newt is the best man for the job. This site has the highest number of referrals to the video. Keep up the good work. If anyone knows of other site and site owns that will embed the site let’s contact them.
Your history is wrong. Unions evolved from the craftsman/apprentice tradition of the 16th to 18th centuries. In the 19th century, because of employer abuse of labor, they were organized to give labor power to negotiate with employers. Early unions were not ideological. In fact, they were very pro America. I can recall NYC hardhats wearing American flag decals on their head gear in the 70s. The were very antiCommunist and challenged the Vietnam anti-war protesters every day.
Alas, labor has always been fertile ground for Marxists. By the 70s Marxists were pretty much in control of the teacher’s unions. During the Vietnam era there were four ways to avoid military draft service: 1. Flee to Canada. 2. Conscientious Objector. 3. Attend seminary. 4. University education major.
It is not an accident that the anti-war/anti America crowd took those outs. It is also not an accident that education and religious leadership was coopted by the Marxists.
Your claim that unions have always been Marxist is as false as a probusiness friend of mine’s claim that emnployers never abused their employees. If that were true the modern labor movement would never have emerged.
4 years after getting control of Congress his obsession with Lewinski causes Clinton to be the first president in 100 years to see his party gain seats in his second mid term.
And the federal budget was never actually balanced, that was a fiction written by snagging a whole bunch of money in zero interest t-bills out of the social security fund.
Like I said, not much of a list of accomplishments.
Oh come on, what are ya, deaf, dumb and blind?
The unions scream communism, they are totalitarian, anti-business and have greedy-corrupt leadership, which is the main reason they exist. They kill the work ethic, promote mediocrity, they stifle production, creativity and enthusiasm.
They're nothing but a bunch of money grubbing Anti-American, terrorists and parasites.
If that were true the modern labor movement would never have emerged.
The "modern labor movement" is Federal, State and Local government. (working "in solidarity" against the American people)
Private sector unions barely appear on the map.
Are there any condensed versions of this video ...i.e., the last three minutes?
No, there isn’t a condensed version.
Too bad ...But, it is still a great job.
Then he is going to have to pledge to fight U.N. Agenda 21 or he can kiss a couple of million votes good bye right now.
This WONDERFUL video has already gone so viral that youtube was verifying the hits in one of my viewings of it. Wowsers. Certainly we all sent it to our addresses, but pronto!
I am even encouraged by the fear mongers tonight, mongering THEIR fear! LOL!! Who are they anyway? Paulbots? Romney Rusers? Do they ever say? Supporters of the ordinary?
A FReeper suggested if we want the anti-Romney to win after South Carolina against Romney, we need to start supporting whoever that is pretty soon wherever we can, by voting for the non-Romney poll leader in our state when our state comes up for their primary. If that helps.
Wow. Newt is a giant. a one in a 300,000,000 kind of a giant.
Winston Churchill was bipolar btw... not that I think Newt is too.
Newt has some issues. Normal people don’t go indulge themselves at Tiffany’s, get married 3 times and walk around with their ass on their shoulders.
“Anyone but Obama”
AS you wish, m’lady ;0)
I would gleefully pull the lever for Newt. I would like to see him balance the ticket with a stout social Conservative, but I think Newt is the best qualified to understand this mess and begin to unwind it. He was correct in his statement about the importance of the House and Senate races - we MUST have deep majorities of thick-skinned Republicans to assist him in doing the nation's work.
Let's go Newt!
lots of men have been married several times. It’s a non-issue to me as are his shopping habits. Newt is an intellectual giant and obviously the
most qualified candidate. The rest of the field seems more qualified for cabinet positions at best. Some of them aren’t even that qualified and if they manage to secure the nomination, I assure you, Obama will make that reality very obvious.
And by resorting to insults you just admitted I’m right but you can’t say it. Don’t need a history lesson I lived the Newt speakership. He didn’t accomplish crap.
I couldn’t understand what Mitt was saying. Anyone?
“Well ... Bye ...”
It’s too bad. For a while you were the only pro-Newt on this thread able to act like an adult. So much for that.
At this point in time, what are Gingrich’s chances for the GOP nomination REALISTICALLY, not “because I want him to win.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.