Posted on 01/08/2012 3:49:48 PM PST by Snoopers-868th
Yes it is amazing but Fox News Bret Bair actually did a segment on the Georgia case that will be coming up soon.
Fox News' Bret Baier: Georgia Ballot Access Challenge Against Obama Gets Hearing
Are you talking about the piece he did above, on Jan 6? Your post of Jan 9 indicates he will be doing a piece?
He is first, foremost, and always a self-centered coward.
I agree. That is my impression of him as well.
It is also possible that LQ and associates were unwitting pawns in an act of espionage, thus providing cover for bad actors to access passport records parallel to the credit card scam... a technique otherwise known as a ruse.
It ain’t completely out of the realm of possibilities. Just saying...
;0)
freepersup
PS Two words- John Brennan.
Meant to ping ya’ to post 304, re: my response to post # 196.
Sordo: “Aside from this post, everything else I’ve seen is post-election.”
And why, exactly, is this important? You and BladeBryan both seem to think that the dual-citizen parent issue must be contested before the 2008 election otherwise it must be concocted or invalid.
Even if the question wasn’t raised until last week, it doesn’t negate the validity of the question. Why is timeline so important to this discussion?
As more and more researchers get on board, there may be even more areas that we find where Obama is ineligible or anti-constitutional. Especially since we are prohibited from access to so many of Obama’s vital records. As this information is exposed to the light of day, I would expect a good number of justifications that this President should be removed or impeached. Because this President has been so protective of his records, we are forced to spend a lot of time speculating and guessing what may be “behind the curtain”. If he were more open with his information, we could immediately eliminate the vast majority of these theories. Most people who have something to hide do just that.
Thanks, lj, for the ping. I’d have missed it otherwise.
Thanks, Obama Exposer, for the info. We’ve been onto Blade almost since the day he signed up. We’ve known he was an Obama-loving liberal, but there were (at least) two schools of thought as to his identity. I appreciate the clarification.
Lucy and Joe, you were right and I was wrong.
Blade, why do you continue to avoid my simple and highly germane questions??? The key to this entire discussion lies w Obama’s integrity. If he’s a fundamentally honest person, then we have to give him the benefit of the doubt. If he’s a pathological liar whose been caught telling whoppers every time he opens his mouth, the situation reverses. In fact, it becomes a case where the mere fact of Obama saying a thing makes the likelihood of it being false close to one-hundred percent.
So which is it? This isn’t rocket surgery. It’s a very simple question. Do you believe Obama is fundamentally honest, or a Malignant Narcissist whose lies define his very existence?
It’s time to put your cards on the table, Blade. Let’s have an answer, *finally*. After all, if you can’t answer this one, how can you claim to know squat about Obama? His integrity, or lack thereof, is the lynchpin. If you don’t know whether he’s honest or not, the rest of your thoughts, ‘facts’ and opinions aren’t worth a warm bucket of spit.
Yeah. I posted this to a troll way back when:
Thu Apr 15 08:40:26 2010 · 249 of 402
Interesting.
Before the primaries we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he wasn’t actually his party’s candidate.
Before the main election we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he wasn’t actually the president elect.
Before the electoral college vote we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he hadn’t actually been elected until the electoral college said so.
Before the congress accepted the electoral college vote we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he hadn’t actually been approved until the congress accepted the electoral college vote.
Before was sworn in we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he hadn’t actually violated the constitution until he became president.
Now that he is president, trolls like you say it’s too late, you should have said something sooner!
From # 294, 0bama Exposer wrote:
BladeBrian is actually the creator and administrator of the pro 0bama website called Fogbow. He and his members favor that a anchor baby born to illegal aliens can become president someday if born on American soil.
They believe a natural born citizen can also be born with citizenship with from another country (like 0bama) and that allegiance doesn’t count. He and his posters don’t believe that the founders ever intended the president to be born with sole allegiance to the U.S..
They are behind a lot of eligibility cases that have been dismissed and one of the posters at the Fogbow went to West Point with the Judge who convicted Col. Terry Lakin.
These people work for 0bama and support subverting the Constitution, especially Article 2 Section 1. This is why I joined this forum so these people can be exposed.
Thank you, 0bama Exposer.
. . . . Also, please see Nully's Post # 309.
.
It is one thing for Obama’s DOJ lawyers to ask the GA judge to “take judicial notice” that the WH “released” a pdf image of an alleged LFBC and quite another to “prove up” a certified copy of the HI LFBC in the GA courtroom under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Entering the HI LFBC into evidence would require an actual physical specimen to be produced in the GA courtroom, IIRC.
From what I have seen Obama and his personal and colluding DOJ lawyers and the HI DOH have placed layer after layer of protection between Obama and the pdf image displayed by the WH beginning with Robert Bauer explicitly stating at the April 27 press conference that Obama would not be personally holding one of the two alleged genuine certified copies of the LFBC that day, but only a photocopy of it.
Does that smell to high heaven or what???
I hope you are right about this, but I have a long standing suspicion of our court system due to a long string of bad/ridiculous decisions that i've seen from the courts and a confidence that if there is a way to do it wrong, they'll find it and order it. :)
Entering the HI LFBC into evidence would require an actual physical specimen to be produced in the GA courtroom, IIRC.
And someone will have to attest to it being an actual "copy" as opposed to an Abstract. I bet you won't find any takers for that one.
From what I have seen Obama and his personal and colluding DOJ lawyers and the HI DOH have placed layer after layer of protection between Obama and the pdf image displayed by the WH beginning with Robert Bauer explicitly stating at the April 27 press conference that Obama would not be personally holding one of the two alleged genuine certified copies of the LFBC that day, but only a photocopy of it.
As I mentioned on another thread, I don't think even his lawyers knew that that file would have layers. Had they known of it, they would have absolutely moved to stop him/his staff from displaying the file.
Does that smell to high heaven or what???
Everything about Obama is tainted of evil and criminality. The one thing I am certain of regarding him is that whether his father be Barack sr. or someone else, he is still an illegitimate bastard. (His father and mother were not legally married.)
Excellent post, Nully!
I may have to isolate you, attack you and demolish you!
Professor Alinsky
one of the posters at the Fogbow went to West Point with the Judge who convicted Col Terry Lakin. These people work for Obama and support subverting the Constitution, especially Article 2 Section 1. This is why I joined this forum so these people can be exposed.>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Welcome to Free Republic
Read this, its good:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html
Fortunately for the record, they were legally divorced. And in that proceeding, where she was represented by HI counsel, she stipulated that she and BSr were married and that BJr was an issue of that marriage. Even assuming the Father slot on any bona fide BC is blank, there probably is not any other credible official record to the contrary.
Thanks for the link, great article!
As many here on FR have been arguing for years, the author gives due notice in her final paragraph. The coming election almost certainly will be the tipping point. If we avoid that, a serious and thorough house-cleaning is mandated.
My point was that even if she got a Marriage license and had a ceremony, Barry is still a bastard because Barack Sr.s pre-existing marriage would render any marriage to Stanley Ann invalid. It is a legal technicality that does leave the result the same. Barack Obama Jr. Is an illegitimate bastard. He is probably the first bonafied actual "bastard" who has occupied the office of the Presidency.
Well, I won’t attempt to speak for Blade Bryan, but there are different reasons to understand the history here.
Some folks have insisted that they have been 2-parent advocates from the beginning, that they were taught this in school and that the judiciary are traitors for not supporting this interpretation of NBC. The known record of FR posts doesn’t support this. The actual written history we have on FR is the 2-parent requirement was barely mentioned prior to October of 2008.
Understanding that the 2-parent requirement is relatively new to the discussion gives some indication that it might not be terribly well supported and probably isn’t a great thing to hang your hat on.
Understand your point, and agree with your choice of words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.