One things for sure.
Most guys ex-wife could end their careers...
or would like to try at the very least. This will all be old news and it will be obvious to most voters that it is a character assassination attempt perpetrated by the leftists who have more reasons to hate Gingrich than his ex-wife.
So what is worse for ABC? To air the thing or to have it and not air it?
It’s a win-win for ABC.
The threat could be worse than the actuality and probably is. If it would ruin Newt, they would certainly air it.
There area lot of FReepers stirred up with differing opinion of Newt, but not one of them can say he is not the brightest bulb on the tree when it come to politics, debates and knowledge of the way Government works.
Romney cannot beat Obama, even with the press laying off Romney, trying to set us up with a Romney run. They will kill Romney when the General election comes off while letting Obama skate.
If Newt can survive the Media war against him in the primary’s the media has shot their wad against Newt. He will be in a good position to beat Obama as the press will only have old news to spread.
On another subject entirely, could the sex between a 15 yer old and his schoolteacher have possibly had anything to do with Newts having adulterous affairs?
And that's the grand mis-calculation.
That, and the fact that many women are married to men who were once married to "that b!tch".
If Marianne doesn't come across as a complete ANGEL, this will add votes to Newt.
The difference here is that Newt’s supporters know he has a history of being sexually twisted beginning with sexual abuse in High School and marriage as a boy to the woman. He does not hide his past (confesses it), rejects it (repents) and has worked to reconcile himself to God. Herman Cain was a compeletely different situation in that he had not admitted what he was doing (denied it and then ran away), he did not see adultery as wrong and that he never turned away from it. The horndog Clinton, like Cain, lied and never repented. Clinton went a step further claiming “everybody does it” - forces the help to have sex with them.
The media falsely claims Christians can not and will not forgive another Christian who has sinned because they don’t acknowledge repentence and spiritual forgiveness and healing. They falsely claim Christians hate and shun all sinners. This lie is central to the Gay radical agenda that if Christians don’t embrace the anal sex lifestyle, it means they HATE homos. For Christians, in reality, the examination of an individual’s nature of sin, repentance and forgiveness is much more complex than a simple one sentence slogan.
That is a central lie of secularism to make sure we have no leaders given they are all guarenteed to be sinners - some repentent and some not. All the secular media has to do to a conservative is dig up a sin and they think it’s over for that candidate. It is time we teach about repentance and forgiveness of sins.