Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

William Jefferson Gingrich [BAD BEAT, RIVERED]
New York Sun ^ | January 25, 2012 | R. EMMETT TYRRELL

Posted on 01/25/2012 3:53:39 PM PST by Nonstatist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last
To: All

Ok. It’s official...we have to be getting into bug zapper thread numbers now.

One of you creative Freepers needs to name this self-inflicted MythSuicides over a multitude of Threads.


101 posted on 01/25/2012 6:13:39 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Some of them have skill in just staying below the surface. Eventually they expose themselves.


102 posted on 01/25/2012 6:13:48 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: All

Ok. It’s official...we have to be getting into bug zapper thread numbers now.

One of you creative Freepers needs to name this self-inflicted MythSuicides over a multitude of Threads.


103 posted on 01/25/2012 6:13:59 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

Watch your step......


104 posted on 01/25/2012 6:14:22 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

Article 1 Section 3 is not that complicated, even a mediocre mind like my own can wrap my arms around it. But impeachment is a political process and conviction was hopeless once Newt and the boys lost seats in November. After the republican leaders in the House resigned it was assured that they would not even garner a majority in the senate for conviction, no less two thirds.

I don’t know what to say to somebody that thinks otherwise.


105 posted on 01/25/2012 6:14:34 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Woofie says...Next !


106 posted on 01/25/2012 6:15:29 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

This is an interesting election by the fact that all the RINOs, who we thought were conservatives, are sticking their heads up above the foxhole to be shot off.

Tyrrell. Bang! Splat!


107 posted on 01/25/2012 6:22:23 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Yes, some ARE good at staying below the radar.. trying to remember how I described it the other day.. Projecting themselves without fully exposing... or something like that.

BUT, this guy has been out in the open with it since the 17th.. well, that’s about as far back as I read of his posts..

Anyway.. feels a bit cleaner on FR now ;)


108 posted on 01/25/2012 6:22:39 PM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Snitchbot


109 posted on 01/25/2012 6:24:56 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr; TheOldLady; 50mm; darkwing104

I lost count (and wasn’t keeping names) around 15 or so.. and that was almost a week ago :p

I will backtrack, but I am sure I have missed many of them myself. TheOldLady, Darkwing104 and 50mm will have to get together and compare notes, I think, to get a general list and count..


110 posted on 01/25/2012 6:27:04 PM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

I’d love to explain why you support ROmney when he is not a conservative, hell he;s not even a republican.

Won’t repeal obamacare.
wants talks with taliban
wants a VAT
is for the homosexual agenda
was or is still who knows with him for planned parents hood
second amendment
the list is endless

can’t be bothered and no time but Romney is no republican nor a conservative, his principles , well he has none.
Te establishment wants him because they want the homosexual agenda much like the talking heads of Coulter, Hannity etc
The establishment wants him because he is socially liberal.

Clearly the establishment did not take the warnings from the base.

No more RINO’s like Romney we want a proper conservative socially and fiscal who has fight, has guts to take obama on, not some wishy washy north east /beltway elitist who likes to go to their elitist cocktail parties with the cross dressers and homosexuals and sup brandy and thinks the north east and the beltway is real America


111 posted on 01/25/2012 6:27:22 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman.Trolls get a life, I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
But impeachment is a political process and conviction was hopeless once Newt and the boys lost seats in November.

Dude do you understand that ONLY SENATORS can vote to acquit or convict in an impeachment trial. This is the result of the Senate elections of 1998.

The balance of the Senate remained unchanged at 55-45 in favor of the Republicans.

112 posted on 01/25/2012 6:29:08 PM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

How is bashing Newt a good thing? Do you see liberals bashing Obama?

Why does our side have this obsessive compulsive behavior to bash their own candidates for all to see??


113 posted on 01/25/2012 6:29:56 PM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

As a Christian, it was very important for me to decide if Newt was truthful about his new faith. I watched him alot, read a lot, and this was one of the most meaningful articles - to me - that I read. Newt is very serious about his faith.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-faith/post/what-kind-of-catholic-is-newt-gingrich/2011/12/14/gIQAvKC2tO_blog.html


114 posted on 01/25/2012 6:32:44 PM PST by true believer forever (First, they came for the rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Reagan’s Young Lieutenant. Gingrich a star on Reagan team...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837275/posts


115 posted on 01/25/2012 6:34:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Brock was a writer for The American Spectator. I used to read it way back in the day. Brock wrote “The Real Anita Hill” just after the Thomas hearings.


116 posted on 01/25/2012 6:39:22 PM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

Sorry, I posted the wrong link - the previous one was to a WaPo blog, this is the actually Post story, which is very thoughtful, and fair.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/newt-gingrich-what-kind-of-catholic-is-he/2011/12/20/gIQA3wRgDP_story.html


117 posted on 01/25/2012 6:46:34 PM PST by true believer forever (First, they came for the rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle; Jim Robinson

“I wish Santorum could get traction because he has good character and will work with congress as well as listen to the people.”

If you think Santorum is free from sin, you aren’t paying attention. Santorum doesn’t have the horsepower or the guts to go up against the criminal Chicago machine and the Marxist media. We tried nice guys before - and Santorum is a nice guy - but today, in these circumstances, we need a fighter who will stomp liberal balls into the concrete.

Santorum won’t do that. Gingrich will. If you want a fight according to Queensbury rules, go watch a checkers match in the park.

We are at war. As JimRob says: Rebellion is on!


118 posted on 01/25/2012 6:56:45 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

LOL. Are you really that naive or are you pulling my leg? Senators of both parties smelled the political winds and knew there would be no repercussions for acquittin Clinton. Two Republican Speakers of thr House had just resigned and under Newts leadership the House lost seats and my opinion is that they lost because our side was only getting a small percentage of Newts capabilities.

:-) That was rich though, the lesson on impeachment. Thanks for the chuckle.


119 posted on 01/25/2012 6:57:40 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: moviefan8

Yep, going to be a lot of that in the next few weeks.


120 posted on 01/25/2012 6:58:44 PM PST by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson