Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC/WSJ poll: Gingrich leads Romney, but badly trails Obama (Newt-37, Mitt-28, Santorum-18)
firstread.msnbc.msn.com ^ | 1/26/2012 | firstread.msnbc.msn.com

Posted on 01/26/2012 4:24:29 PM PST by TBBT

Newt Gingrich leads Mitt Romney among Republicans, he is the weakest of the Republican candidates tested against President Obama, according to an NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll released Thursday evening. Gingrich leads Romney 37 percent to 28 percent nationally among registered Republicans likely to vote in the primaries; Rick Santorum is in third with 18 percent, and Ron Paul is fourth with 12 percent. Gingrich has built its advantage by consolidating the heart and soul of the Republican party: very conservative voters, the South and the Tea Party. Though Gingrich is the preferred candidate of GOP primary voters, though, he performs the worst of all Republican candidates tested against Obama, including Santorum. Read the full poll results here

(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fakepushpoll; nbcbainpoll; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Florida must be another planet.
1 posted on 01/26/2012 4:24:34 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT

It is my considered opinion that Herman Cain was the only Republican that could beat 0bama0.

However, the DemonRATs effectively neutralized him.

There is nobody in the current Republican field that can beat 0bama0, ceteris parabus.

The two weakest candidates are the two front-runners. Neither Mitt nor Gingrich can beat 0bama0

Mitt says 0bama0’s doing a fine job. So why vote for him?

Gingrich has way too much baggage and is a lightning rod for the Leftist droolers. They will find dirtier dirt on him yet, and effectively neutralize him.


2 posted on 01/26/2012 4:29:14 PM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Can’t you read?

This is national.

I DON’T CARE !!

I DON’T WANT ROMNEY. I’LL VOTE FOR BOB DOLE BEFORE I’LL VOTE FOR ROMNEY AND ALL OF THIS NASTY CAMPAIGNING IS GOING TO BACKFIRE ON HIM.


3 posted on 01/26/2012 4:29:27 PM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
You know, I'm not this biggest Gingrich supporter in the world, but apparently the liberals think he will beat zero easily.

If they really thought he would lose, they would be keeping their mouths shut and rubbing their hands with glee. Apparently, given the onslaught of work they are doing to keep him from getting the nomination, they must think he can win.

Personally, I don't see his chances that good, but the liberals must be on to something to put forth this kind of effort.

4 posted on 01/26/2012 4:32:28 PM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Heresy, I know, on this forum, but I believe you maybe correct.


5 posted on 01/26/2012 4:33:09 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Exactly.


6 posted on 01/26/2012 4:33:20 PM PST by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

NBC HAS to find a negative spin on good news for Newt.

I’m sure they’re thinking: “Let’s scare Conservatives into voting for Mitt”.

In fairness, it’s worked before :(


7 posted on 01/26/2012 4:33:44 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
However, the DemonRATs effectively neutralized him.

If he was guilty of what he was accused of, then he effectively neutralized himself. If he wasn't, then he neutralized himself through his poor handling of the accusations.

Too bad, because I had high hopes for him, too.

8 posted on 01/26/2012 4:34:07 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
Now, come on-would a lefty site tell the truth that Newt was behind Obama when Drudge 2 days ago had Obama and Newt tied nationally. Pile on. They know there is a strong chance to beat Obama with the Tea Party ground swell.
9 posted on 01/26/2012 4:34:32 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Looks like the relentless Newt attacks are helping Santorum more than Mitt.


10 posted on 01/26/2012 4:34:46 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

This poll is a joke. They want Romney towin because they know Dummy can beat him. They fear Gingrich, as well they should. Deal with it libs, your teleprompter prince is going DOWN! GO NEWT!!


11 posted on 01/26/2012 4:36:59 PM PST by mardi59 (Newt brings hope, and change is coming. 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

I agree with you 100%.

As a Black Conservative, President Cain would have undercut the foundation of LBJ’s welfare state and been an effective antidote to the lib media propaganda based on racism/sexism that pervades virtually every policy debate.

In that sense, Cain’s value was not just winning in 2012. His value was 8 years of a Conservative Black American undoing a dynamic that has perennially paralyzed our country on all levels of government.


12 posted on 01/26/2012 4:37:05 PM PST by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

It seems that “surrender” is your favorite word, ceteris parabus.

GO NEWT GO......


13 posted on 01/26/2012 4:40:35 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
I want a reformer, a fighter-if the guy has problems so be it. I am tired of nothing ever changing. I was for Cain. He never came back to defend himself. Mitt will lose to Obama because he will not have the base. He will have the card carrying repubs moonbats but not the masses. Oh, yes, Obama wins. At least, with Newt we can flush out the problems and have a chance to set the agenda.
14 posted on 01/26/2012 4:45:32 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Okay so now let’s check the conservative media to see what the results would be. Oh, wait, conservative media poll???


15 posted on 01/26/2012 4:48:49 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Never Have Regrets Because At The Time It Was Exactly What You Wanted")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

You need to start buying bottled water because there must be something in your water that’s making you CRAZY and saying stupid things!


16 posted on 01/26/2012 4:55:29 PM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

gosh we should sure vote for Romney because he is more electable than the guy who is ...um....beating him in the election


17 posted on 01/26/2012 4:58:05 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
The most ridiculous internals of a poll I've ever seen. They don't ask party affiliation in the 1000 person sample. You have to wade through the these bizarre categories to see that republicans are under sampled:

A lot of people are unable to get out and vote for many reasons. Did you happen to vote in last November's election for president? (IF “YES,” ASK:) For whom did you vote––Barack Obama, John McCain, or someone else? Yes, Voted Voted for Barack Obama ................ 43 Voted for John McCain ................... 30 Voted for someone else ................. 4 Not sure .......................................... 3 No, Did Not Vote ............................. 19 Not sure ........................................

Thinking about your general approach to issues, do you consider yourself to be liberal, moderate, or conservative? (IF "LIBERAL" OR "CONSERVATIVE," ASK:) Do you consider yourself to be very (liberal/conservative) or somewhat (liberal/conservative)? Very liberal .................... 8 Somewhat liberal ................13 Moderate .........................37 Somewhat conservative .............22 Very conservative ................. 17 Not sure ........................... 3

18 posted on 01/26/2012 5:06:12 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

The numbers for Obama in that poll for the media folks show a likely hysterically skewed poll.


19 posted on 01/26/2012 5:07:24 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I’d rather “lose” with Newt than “win” with Romney.

Four more years of Obama is less of a worry to me than a potential eight years of Romney coupled with a Republican Congress similar to the one in place during most of Dubya’s time.


20 posted on 01/26/2012 5:15:45 PM PST by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson