Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

NA
1 posted on 01/26/2012 6:57:27 PM PST by vmivol00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: vmivol00

Didn’t see it. I have no opinion.


2 posted on 01/26/2012 7:00:17 PM PST by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Who cares what you think.


3 posted on 01/26/2012 7:00:48 PM PST by Riptides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

I too, support Newt and concur with your observation.

Rick Santorum is having a good night.


4 posted on 01/26/2012 7:01:39 PM PST by Bahama Mama (FReeper in Paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

There is another thread that says a similar thing. Are we getting hit by seminar Romney bots?


5 posted on 01/26/2012 7:02:42 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00
I am willing to support a Wrong Paul blanket party.

There are three old pairs of combat boots in my bedroom closet and pillow cases in the linen closet.

6 posted on 01/26/2012 7:02:53 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Ron Paul is just as bad as Romney only for different reasons. In some ways, Paul might even be worse. You are saying you’d vote 3rd party for a guy (Paul) who thinks the traitor Bradley Manning is a hero and patriot. That alone disqualifies Paul.

Romney the chameleon is awful, Paul could be worse.


7 posted on 01/26/2012 7:04:04 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

There are only two candidates left I would vote for in the general election: Santorum and Gingrich, in that order. If Romney or Paul get the nomination, then I will write in Sarah Palin.

Romney strongly supports the unlimited detention provision in the NDAA. He is effectively indistinguishable from Obama. Paul is nuts. He thinks it’s OK if Iran gets nukes. There are plenty of other reasons to oppose Romney and Paul, but those two alone disqualify them from the presidency, IMHO.


12 posted on 01/26/2012 7:13:46 PM PST by StonyMan451 (As for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00; Riptides

There is already a debate thread, but you had to stop your own for your own ego’s glory and with meaningless cliches to boot? Riptides is right, who cares.


15 posted on 01/26/2012 7:16:47 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

I followed the Live Thread. CNN-Obama stacked the audience with Romney supporters, and Wolf Blitzed asked ridiculous questions like “Who would be the best First Lady?”

Santorum appeared to get some good shots in, and RuPaul was chock full o’ nuts, but the main barbs were between Newt and Willard, with CNN-Obama running interference for Willard.

I will do nothing but spit on Willard. Santorum is becoming more Vice-Presidential with each successive debate. And I would be pleased to see Newt select him for a running mate.


16 posted on 01/26/2012 7:19:03 PM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson