| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 01/26/2012 7:19:55 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 01/26/2012 6:57:24 PM PST by vmivol00
I am a Newt supporter. So far he hasn't been too fiery. That being said, I refuse to support Romney. If its not Romney, I'm ready to support a Ron Paul third party candidacy.
Romney is a gun grabbing socialist with no integrity. If we have to have a gun grabbing socialist in the Whitehouse, I'd rather it be a Democrat.
Didn’t see it. I have no opinion.
Who cares what you think.
I too, support Newt and concur with your observation.
Rick Santorum is having a good night.
There is another thread that says a similar thing. Are we getting hit by seminar Romney bots?
There are three old pairs of combat boots in my bedroom closet and pillow cases in the linen closet.
Ron Paul is just as bad as Romney only for different reasons. In some ways, Paul might even be worse. You are saying you’d vote 3rd party for a guy (Paul) who thinks the traitor Bradley Manning is a hero and patriot. That alone disqualifies Paul.
Romney the chameleon is awful, Paul could be worse.
Tis is ricks best night yet. Bravo!,,,, BTW...people who support a third party run talk a bunch of absolute bullshit when they say that they give a crap about this country.
If you don’t care...don’t reply. It’s pretty simple.
I take it you are a Romney supporter. I believe in the 2nd amendment, and capitalism. Romney believes in socialism for the people and capitalism for himself.
I will never vote for that POS.
I’m not a Paul fan...that being said Romney =Obama. Im a Newt fan and then would support Paul. Romney is clearly a socialist and a gun grabber. I will never support that POS.
There are only two candidates left I would vote for in the general election: Santorum and Gingrich, in that order. If Romney or Paul get the nomination, then I will write in Sarah Palin.
Romney strongly supports the unlimited detention provision in the NDAA. He is effectively indistinguishable from Obama. Paul is nuts. He thinks it’s OK if Iran gets nukes. There are plenty of other reasons to oppose Romney and Paul, but those two alone disqualify them from the presidency, IMHO.
If you didn’t care what I think, you wouldn’t have replied. Go back to the Romney socialist tent.
Yes, third party is not the answer.
Rick Santorum is having his best night ever and ending very strongly. Too bad he didn’t have this fire in his belly early in the race.
Newt is still my guy. He’s taken so many hits from Romney, Drudge, Ann Coulter, et al in the past few days, he seems a little down.
Romney makes my skin crawl...
There is already a debate thread, but you had to stop your own for your own ego’s glory and with meaningless cliches to boot? Riptides is right, who cares.
I followed the Live Thread. CNN-Obama stacked the audience with Romney supporters, and Wolf Blitzed asked ridiculous questions like “Who would be the best First Lady?”
Santorum appeared to get some good shots in, and RuPaul was chock full o’ nuts, but the main barbs were between Newt and Willard, with CNN-Obama running interference for Willard.
I will do nothing but spit on Willard. Santorum is becoming more Vice-Presidential with each successive debate. And I would be pleased to see Newt select him for a running mate.
You won’t be reconstructed but watch out for the purification of pure light.
Dumb move - NO third party has succeeded in the modern era. That ensures the worst outcome for conservatism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.